picoc
proposal-observable
picoc | proposal-observable | |
---|---|---|
10 | 12 | |
325 | 3,036 | |
- | 0.2% | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
almost 2 years ago | over 4 years ago | |
C | JavaScript | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
picoc
- Can I load board operations from text file as part of boot.
-
dont want online ones
and picoc, but it also features interactive shell
- Python interpreter
-
Make repo
I would like to try this C REPL: https://github.com/jpoirier/picoc
-
why can't you compile an interpreted language?
You can. People have written an interpreter for C, and you could write a compiler for Python.
-
Where to learn csh?
Yeah, I would not choose to learn the C-shell simply because it shares a letter with the compiled language. You might be better served learning Pike or PicoC.
- How to create your own language that compile to JavaScript
-
What is the difference between VM based languages and those without VM?
But don't get caught up in the VM definition, the whole act of compiling to VM bytecode and then to native is just another step in the chain. For example here is a C interpreter that lets you do the same thing, without intermediate bytecode.
-
Replacing let with const – Even when it feels impossible
Can we please cut the bullshit. By that logic no language is compiled. Because behold, a C interpreter: https://github.com/jpoirier/picoc
-
[Education] How important is knowing how to code in the field of statistics ?
Languages can have a compiler, an interpreter, or both. Just because a language is commonly thought of as 'compiled' doesn't mean you can't write an interpreter for it, or vice versa. There's even C interpreters for crying out loud https://github.com/jpoirier/picoc .
proposal-observable
-
Proposal: Signals as a Built-In Primitive of JavaScript
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable
And there's the new one which seems to be getting implemented in node right now:
-
Observable API Proposal
How does it differ from <https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable/>?
-
The Truth about Svelte
I think it is a shame that the Observable proposal [1] still seems somewhat stuck in Stage 1. It's a better idea than just raw event emitters because of composability (if no other reason). Making Observables "first class" could go a long way to unifying a lot of reactivity patterns in various frameworks, in theory at least.
To be fair, Observables and especially Observable composition has a rough learning curve and many frameworks like Svelte intentionally prefer implict reactivity and avoiding things like explicit Observables because they are seen as too complex/"too hard" for the average developer.
(Then you get awful worst of both worlds frameworks like Angular that sort of rely on Observables but yet also don't trust teaching Observables and wind up with code that isn't properly Observable and so also has all the code for implicit reactivity and is full of nasty escape hatches that cause all sorts of composition problems and unnecessary side effects.)
[1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable
-
💡 Observable Mutable Wrapper Object
Uses an interface described in the TC39 observables proposal
-
Example of Asynchronous programming using Observer pattern vs Promise
JavaScript doesn't have any built-in observables (addEventListener is part of the DOM API specific to browsers) though there is an old observable proposal collecting dust. I think ReactiveX (RxJS) is pretty much the go-to for any kind of observable functionality you may want. That may be a good place to start to really see what observables can do.
-
JavaScript Evolutsiyasi Qisqa Satrlarda!
Observablelar streamlarga asoslangan reaktiv dasturlash paradigmasini olib kiradi JSga. Shaxsan menga eng yoqqan takliflardan biri. Bu haqida ham alohida maqola yozish niyat bor. RxJS (Angular) bilan ishlab ko'rganlar bo'lsa buni nimaligini juda yaxshi tushunishadi, endi bu library emas balki native 🚀 !!!
-
4 Ways to Handle Async Operations in Javascript
Observable is an object that takes a stream of data and emits events over time to react accordingly. There is a talk to add it to the ECMAScript standard and its proposal is here. Till now it is not part of the ECMAScript standard so to use it, you have to use a third-party library and the well-known Reactive Extension in Javascript is RxJs.
-
Reactive Programming
Well, the answer is surprisingly no. But, there is an active tc39 proposal going on around for a while, didn’t find it much active though, you could watch out here — https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable
-
Why do we need rxjs library as JavaScript is reactive by default?
RxJS is an implementation of observables which do not exist natively in JavaScript. There is a proposal for adding observables to the language, but it's only stage 1 and hasn't been active for years.
- Query Engines: Push vs. Pull
What are some alternatives?
eslint-plugin-unicorn - More than 100 powerful ESLint rules
duckdb - DuckDB is an in-process SQL OLAP Database Management System
esprima - ECMAScript parsing infrastructure for multipurpose analysis
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
babel-handbook - :blue_book: A guided handbook on how to use Babel and how to create plugins for Babel.
eslint-plugin-github - An opinionated collection of ESLint rules used by GitHub.
proposal-pattern-matching - Pattern matching syntax for ECMAScript
RxJS - A reactive programming library for JavaScript
clauf - A C interpreter developed live on YouTube
cross-project-council - OpenJS Foundation Cross Project Council