r3 VS r3d4

Not from scratch, I use r3, https://github.com/phreda4/r3.

I only use turns in my code, my lib is here (forth.r3) https://github.com/phreda4/r3/blob/main/r3/lib/math.r3

You can try https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4 for rpi or https://github.com/phreda4/r3 for win

almost all my codes in https://github.com/phreda4/r3 and https://github.com/phreda4/r4 have less 1000 lines, but all forth have code with minimun lines of code

The last aproach is r3 (I change the access to SO) in development) https://github.com/phreda4/r3

an the last https://github.com/phreda4/r3

You can try https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4 for rpi or https://github.com/phreda4/r3 for win

The evolution but without so much code in 64bits windows,linux,mac and rpi https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4

r3 is in developent, the first https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4

I have a vm in c for my forth, I have a compiler to asm (generate FASM output) but in the same lenguage, really a forth compiler is a simple program, there are a 1:1 correspondence in code genaration and words. here the 32bits source https://github.com/phreda4/r4/blob/master/r4/System/r4i86.txt here the 64bits with some optimizations: https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4/blob/master/r3/sys/r3asm0.r3 I hope this help

I don't know if is the best for you but my work https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4

not GFORTH but I use sdl in r3 (colorforth like) for access to graphic buffer. https://github.com/phreda4/r3d4