phoronix-test-suite VS stress-ng

I think they do a lot of good stuff, like LTO and PGO.

But in benchmarks you sometimes see like a 4x speedup compared to ubuntu, which is obviously not due to superior compilers.

For example:

https://github.com/phoronix-test-suite/phoronix-test-suite/i...

phoronix test suite has a benchmark for pretty much everything

I think you can use the Phoronix Test Suite for build time bench mark testing

But I have no clue what could I use for actual benchmarking part. I know about Phoronix Test Suite, but from what I can tell, it’s designed to compile the tested software on its own, ignoring the pre-installed software—see Q: Why does the Phoronix Test Suite not use my distribution's package management system for acquiring all needed packages?:

I grabbed the https://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ on a whim.

Using the phoronix test suite when I attempt to run it on my Linux machine, it opens the game in full screen on the 2nd monitor.

If you want an all-in-one, maybe something like the Phoronix Test Suite? You can run just the disk tests, if that's all you want. https://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/

There is the Phoronix test suite. Lots of benchmarks etc there,

I used the following stress-ng command for this example:

I would look into using stress/stress-ng to fully load your system and monitor the temperatures over an hour. If it's less than 80C after that hour, should be all good.

One can also just use stress-ng [0], which is packaged in pretty much any distro.

[0] https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng

stress-ng is available on most OSes. https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng

https://github.com/ColinIanKing/stress-ng is pretty great