QED VS mps-code-reviewer

Compare QED vs mps-code-reviewer and see what are their differences.

QED

NOW OBSOLETE. UTF-8/Unicode-aware port of Rob Pike's QED editor for Unix (by phonologus)

mps-code-reviewer

Code Review for JetBrains MPS providing integration with Bitbucket (by Workday)
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
QED mps-code-reviewer
1 1
32 15
- -
2.7 0.0
3 months ago about 1 year ago
C
- Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

QED

Posts with mentions or reviews of QED. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-06.
  • Ask HN: More “experimental“ UIs for editing/writing code?
    14 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Aug 2022
    Not exactly "experimental", considering the Unix heritage, but -- line editors.

    "I've seen [visual] editors like that, but I don't feel a need for them. I don't want to see the state of the file when I'm editing." -- Ken Thompson, on the superiority of ed to visual editors. Summarized by Peter Salus in A Quarter Century of UNIX (Addison-Wesley, 1994).

    Definitely a blast from the past, but I do think line editors may force one to write simpler programs -- or to think in smaller chunks, as opposed to (doom)scrolling or moving about incrementally on a large screen.

    Rob Pike's sam editor has an interesting command language. You're not limited to thinking in "lines" as in ed or sed; rather, the whole file is a giant string that you manipulate using regular expressions, external pipes, etc: http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/sam_lang_tutorial/sam_tut.pdf

    Its predecessor, qed, is also interesting, extremely powerful, but it seems to have a much steeper learning curve. I have used sam quite a bit, but not qed. https://github.com/phonologus/QED/raw/master/doc/qed-tutoria...

mps-code-reviewer

Posts with mentions or reviews of mps-code-reviewer. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-06.
  • Ask HN: More “experimental“ UIs for editing/writing code?
    14 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Aug 2022
    > I'm not sure anyone's actually using it, but there are some good ideas in there.

    I guess it's kind of cheating, but they wrote YouTrack in MPS; they used to cite that in the footer, but I guess it was removed cause it was an implementation detail

    I reached out to them to ask "what does that mean, written in MPS?" and they said they had a DSL for issue tracking that essentially generated executable YouTrack builds

    Interestingly, Workday has a repo for MPS code reviews, although stale: https://github.com/Workday/mps-code-reviewer#readme

What are some alternatives?

When comparing QED and mps-code-reviewer you can also consider the following projects:

metadesk

lisperanto - Lisperanto is a spatial canvas for programming; Lisperanto is a spatial canvas for knowledge; Lisperanto is a spatial canvas for ideas;

unit - Next Generation Visual Programming System

impulse - Impossible Dev Tools for React and Tailwind