QED
awesome-structure-editors
Our great sponsors
QED | awesome-structure-editors | |
---|---|---|
1 | 10 | |
32 | 302 | |
- | - | |
2.7 | 4.8 | |
3 months ago | about 1 month ago | |
C | Python | |
- | Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
QED
-
Ask HN: More “experimental“ UIs for editing/writing code?
Not exactly "experimental", considering the Unix heritage, but -- line editors.
"I've seen [visual] editors like that, but I don't feel a need for them. I don't want to see the state of the file when I'm editing." -- Ken Thompson, on the superiority of ed to visual editors. Summarized by Peter Salus in A Quarter Century of UNIX (Addison-Wesley, 1994).
Definitely a blast from the past, but I do think line editors may force one to write simpler programs -- or to think in smaller chunks, as opposed to (doom)scrolling or moving about incrementally on a large screen.
Rob Pike's sam editor has an interesting command language. You're not limited to thinking in "lines" as in ed or sed; rather, the whole file is a giant string that you manipulate using regular expressions, external pipes, etc: http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/sam_lang_tutorial/sam_tut.pdf
Its predecessor, qed, is also interesting, extremely powerful, but it seems to have a much steeper learning curve. I have used sam quite a bit, but not qed. https://github.com/phonologus/QED/raw/master/doc/qed-tutoria...
awesome-structure-editors
-
Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
Yes, I think that we can do better than plain text as the source of truth, and thus git would probably need to change.
There's work around a bunch of languages that are not based on text, some have their own editor or a tool to manage a canonical representation in text for you that would make them friendlier to git.
- https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors/blob/main/README.md
- Structure Editors: A list of projectional code editor projects
-
Pijul: Version-Control Post-Git • Goto 2023
There's many more akin projects listed in https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors/blob/ma...
I can't wait fast enough for these ideas to reshape how we deal with programs and build stuff.
-
Is Haskell gaining or losing popularity?
Haskell seems to be pretty big. For example in this list of projects it appears to be the second most popular language (after TypeScript) :)
-
Ask HN: Any IDEs or text editor plugins with AST-driven navigation?
See https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors
-
A Block-Based Functional Programming Language
You could submit a pull request to get it added to awesome-structure-editors by /u/yairchu
-
Emacs Is Not Enough
It would be interesting to have such a general project go somewhere.
While in principle structural editing sounds like an incredible advance, there are 'good enough' advantages to plain-text tools that make it a much more practical solution. The other issue is of course integration with existing tooling, which you either skip entirely or compromise on the design.
What I feel is missing, between the description of "old, bad state of things" and "utopian vision" is a review of some of the projects that already tried to achieve this ideal state. It turns out there are a number of them, and most of them failed to achieve any traction or impact [0].
The rants are very long, so I skimmed quickly the one about git; I understand the complaints, although git is only bringing me joy and no pain --interactive rebase, absorb and a few aliases made it a breeze. But in a similar fashion there are projects trying to solve its fundamental issues, like pijul(.org); what are they missing?
[0] https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors/blob/ma...
- Ask HN: Is Vim still worth learning?
- Structure Editors
-
Ask HN: More “experimental“ UIs for editing/writing code?
Some good ones pops up in Projectional Programming [1] once in a while. The pinned thread links to the structure-editors github list [2] too.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nosyntax/
[2] https://github.com/yairchu/awesome-structure-editors
What are some alternatives?
metadesk
lisperanto - Lisperanto is a spatial canvas for programming; Lisperanto is a spatial canvas for knowledge; Lisperanto is a spatial canvas for ideas;
unit - Next Generation Visual Programming System
git-stack - Stacked branch management for Git
gtoolkit - Glamorous Toolkit is the Moldable Development environment. It empowers you to make systems explainable through experiences tailored for each problem.
git-machete - Probably the sharpest git repository organizer & rebase/merge workflow automation tool you've ever seen
gumtree - An awesome code differencing tool
COMP3200Project - A Web-Based IDE, written using SVELTE and the Blockly System, to assist the teaching of Haskell using a Scratch like language
git-imerge - Incremental merge for git
desktop - Focus on what matters instead of fighting with Git.