phoenix-liveview-cluster
firebuild
| phoenix-liveview-cluster | firebuild | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 46 | 92 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| about 3 years ago | over 2 years ago | |
| Elixir | Go | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
phoenix-liveview-cluster
-
Docker Without Docker
I have been surprised how little good tooling there is for Elixir, and even full stack in general.
Clustering is supported, you can set libcluster to use our internal DNS to discover nodes: https://github.com/fly-apps/phoenix-liveview-cluster/blob/ma...
You also need some environment variables: https://github.com/fly-apps/phoenix-liveview-cluster/blob/ma...
And a dockerfile: https://github.com/fly-apps/phoenix-liveview-cluster/blob/ma...
We definitely need tutorials. We're hiring someone specifically to work on the entire Elixir dev UX, so hopefully we'll improve soon.
firebuild
-
We clone a running VM in 2 seconds
Regarding turning Dockerfiles into a MicroVM: https://gruchalski.com/posts/2021-03-23-introducing-firebuil..., on GitHub: https://github.com/combust-labs/firebuild. This could get you started.
Disclaimer: I’m the author.
-
Podman 4.0.0
> See, and in almost all of my use-cases, I really do. I do HPC computing, which is almost always a multi-tenant environment.
Maybe you need firecracker with something along the lines of https://github.com/combust-labs/firebuild?
-
Hypervisor for multi-tenant computing, like it should be
I was the one who posted that question and I deleted it because I understood I was asking to compare apple to oranges. Firecracker uses KVM under the hood. With regards to the overhead, sure, there's going to be resources needed but firecracker is pretty good at running VMs will low level overhead. We're talking thousands on a single host.
I've done some fair share of evaluating firecracker for https://github.com/combust-labs/firebuild and the need to provision is red herring. firebuild can run a VM directly from a Dockerfile and Docker image. Fly.io team does something similar. It's basically a fully functional app out of the container within a matter of milliseconds.
What would be nice is to see a direct comparison between your solution and firecracker.
-
Docker Without Docker
I am working on something like this: https://github.com/combust-labs/firebuild.
From a Dockerfile, it's not as simple without creating an image first.
What are some alternatives?
firecracker-containerd - firecracker-containerd enables containerd to manage containers as Firecracker microVMs
cloud-hypervisor - A Virtual Machine Monitor for modern Cloud workloads. Features include CPU, memory and device hotplug, support for running Windows and Linux guests, device offload with vhost-user and a minimal compact footprint. Written in Rust with a strong focus on security.
rchab - Fly.io Remote Builder (Remote Controlled Hot Air Balloon)
linuxkit - A toolkit for building secure, portable and lean operating systems for containers
simplenetes - The sns tool is used to manage the full life cycle of your Simplenetes clusters. It integrates with the Simplenetes Podcompiler project podc to compile pods.
mariadb-podman-socket-activation - Demo of a templated systemd user service that runs rootless Podman and starts MariaDB with socket activation
firecracker-container
kubevirt - Kubernetes Virtualization API and runtime in order to define and manage virtual machines.
kind - Kubernetes IN Docker - local clusters for testing Kubernetes