phoenicis-winebuild VS phoenicis

I haven't checked with a network debugger, bug I believe they build each Wine version and store the binaries on their own servers. https://www.playonlinux.com/wine/

I’m not sure what’s wrong in the PlayOnMac Catalina+ client as that’s not something I’ve look into, only I’ve assisted with phoenicis-winebuild no other components outside of some tested when requested.

And for there builder https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis-winebuild

On a side note I’m a member of Phoenicis due to the work I’ve done on phoenicis-winebuild

Unless someone wants to deal with cross-compiling gnutls along with all of it’s dependencies in linux-amd64-wine_osxcross it’s not going to work.

If you need Windows software for VI, I recommend to use software for managing multiple prefixes. This way you can setup ideal environment for each software (if you use multiple ones) and try out if one environment fits or if you need to adjust the environment. I use phoenicis ( https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis ).

For this case I recommend to use Phoenicis https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis

That was playonlinux 4. Now They changed the name to Phoenicis PlayOnLinux 5.

Issues\ ideas: https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis/issues

Sauce for GitHub page (for you guys who want to try it) : WineGUI & PlayOnLinux 5.

The current source for PlayOn client is actually https://github.com/PhoenicisOrg/phoenicis