pgsql-http VS sqlx

I don’t understand the question https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http

I am trying to use the supabase http rest client extension to fetch data from an external API. Following the supabase docs and the GitHub repo readme, I have not been able to successfully make a request that requires auth, specifically an API key in the request header with key x-api-key.

- Hasura Remote Schema (https://hasura.io/blog/tagged/remote-schemas/)

If you want more control over the web API and you were going to fetch the data within your Python back-end and process it there, for some use-cases (not all, but some), there are options:

- pg_http (https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http)

Life is about trade-offs. Doing the work in SQL is not without its drawbacks, but it's also not without its benefits, and that's true for doing the work in a general-purpose language as well. Whatever the drawbacks of doing it in SQL, one of the benefits has got to be eliminating the impedance mismatch (for people who regard that mismatch as a problem, and the OP seems to be one such person). What I claim is that doing the work directly in the database shouldn't be ruled out in general (the specifics of a given use-case may rule it out in particular) any more the the other common patterns (API hand-written in Python, for instance) shouldn't be ruled out in general.

You could e.g. use the trigger to call http api using e.g. https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http

I do this all the time just with Postgres functions. Just turn on the following extensions: http (https://github.com/pramsey/pgsql-http) pg_cron (https://github.com/citusdata/pg\_cron)

For PostgreSQL, the most relevent part of the code is here. With this in mind I changed some things around to rely on schemas instead of databases and even simplified some parts of the implementation as this was always meant to be for internal use only..

What exactly are you missing? I haven't really written "boring corporate backend stuff" in a few years but something like sqlx provides everything I've ever needed there.

Badges are the little rectangles you typically see at the top of a crate's README: https://github.com/launchbadge/sqlx/blob/main/README.md

SQLX has entered the chat [1].

[1] https://github.com/launchbadge/sqlx

Database : SqLite (using sqlx).

The current (well, removed) MSSQL sqlx driver also doesn't support encrypted connections (https://github.com/launchbadge/sqlx/issues/1552), so it might work locally on an unnamed instance but not over the network until they add in the newer driver (which will be closed source but for an OSS project you should be able to request a free license I think)

I'm considering making my own wrapper over lower-level database drivers. There are a lot of features in sqlx that I don't need, and the latest version seems to have removed useful data structures that SQLPage is using. It also removed support for SQL Server.

add Ed25519 to AuthPlugin enum on https://github.com/launchbadge/sqlx/blob/061fdcabd72896d9bc3abb4ea4af6712a04bc0a8/sqlx-core/src/mysql/connection/auth.rs and implement them using these crates: