pg_timetable VS noms

That's easily done with a cron job or something similar (e.g. pg_timetable)

When you are working on Oracle to PostgreSQL migrations, one of the Oracle packages that cause conversion issues is DBMS_JOB. Traditionally, we used extensions like : pg_agent, pg_cron or more recently pg_timetable for scheduling jobs. All of these tools or extensions use a cronjob like scheduling method which does not give a full compatibility of the features provided by Oracle DBMS_JOB. Translating calls to DBMS_JOB.SUBMIT() into a cron setting is more painful than being impossible when there is an execution interval lesser than a minute. There are several such DBMS_JOB compatibility issues including asynchronous scheduling which is not possible with the already existing extensions in PostgreSQL. MigOps hates to stay without Open Source solutions. So, we are announcing PG_DBMS_JOB extension for Oracle DBMS_JOB compatibility, released under PostgreSQL License. An interesting point here is that we have included full compatibility of Oracle DBMS_JOB in PG_DBMS_JOB PostgreSQL extension.

If you don't want to (or can't) use the Windows Scheduler, you might want to try out pg_timetable instead, which also offers Windows binaries.

Try pg_timetable

You better send emails periodically with cron-like scheduler. This one can do both cron and periodical jobs: https://github.com/cybertec-postgresql/pg_timetable

This is from 2022. It is based on Noms [1], which is no longer maintained (they forked it).

I think the Noms doc linked from this article [2] is clearer than the article itself. That said I sill cannot turn my head around to grasp how this entire thing work tbh. I hope they wrote a peer reviewed paper to serve the audience better.

[1] https://github.com/attic-labs/

[2] https://github.com/attic-labs/noms/blob/master/doc/intro.md#...

I am. But i know very little about CRDTs lol, so we'll see how that goes. I'm interested in converting some immutable, local-first data warehouse tooling i enjoy to a CRDT version. Prior it was more.. Git-like. Basically just Git with data structures inspired-massively from Noms[1].

The thing i've found most interesting is it appears[2] that CRDT backends need to expose CRDT flavored types to users. Which is to say how i'm writing this combines the notion of a type, say `[i32]` with how you want the merges to work. CRDT works great but based on my amateur-hour researching on the subject i don't feel you can write a single CRDT merge strategy for a single data type ala `[i32]` and have it be always correct. Applications need to indicate enough context on what makes sense for a given data type.

So yea, i agree with you. I'm interested in making a database-like thing, backed by CRDTs, but i also have seen very few general purpose implementations with CRDTs. It feels like i'm breaking "new ground", while having no idea what i'm doing and having no intention of being an actual researcher here. I'm just making apps i enjoy heh.

[1]: https://github.com/attic-labs/noms

Most of the changes are in the noms package which used to live in a separate repo (https://github.com/attic-labs/noms), but Dolt has since adopted them.

Not much more to say other than Noms was my favorite project (https://github.com/attic-labs/noms) for a while until acquisition and the engineers are now the ones behind Replicache (https://replicache.dev/).

I think this is going to be the next "Realm" that works everywhere.

The storage layer based on Noms: https://github.com/attic-labs/noms

Noms might be what you’re looking for (https://github.com/attic-labs/noms). Dolt is actually a fork of Noms.

People that are interested in a similar feature set should check out https://github.com/attic-labs/noms and the SQL fork of Noms, https://github.com/dolthub/dolt