pg_net VS wundergraph

> speaks a particular API over the network

it's a interesting idea, and one of the things that we were toying with in our pg_net extension (https://github.com/supabase/pg_net). This is a "generic" async network extension, so you can fetch/put/post. It works well for APIs.

I think the generic approach works for some things where the data is less "fixed" - for example, an OpenAI API endpoint.

But for "fixed" data (data warehouses), the wrapper usually needs some custom work for security, protocols, and "push down". I'll be interested to get HN's take on this - they might have some suggestions for us for this framework

> finding the building blocks of modern applications (database, auth, functions, presence, realtime subscriptions), making them easy to use, and then sharing the source code.

Great observation!

> I’ve learned a ton just from cruising around supabase GitHub.

Glad to hear it!

> Can you say which of these new components will be open sourced?

All of these components are open source and licensed under Apache License v2.0.

> There are some other features (e.g. function hooks) that are also closed-source at the moment.

I actually worked on the initial implementation of function hooks. We've actually already open sourced both the client (see: https://github.com/supabase/supabase/tree/88bcef911669595428...) and the pg_net extension it requires (see: https://github.com/supabase/pg_net).

> Is Supabase heading for an “open core” model?

I don't think so. We want to continue to open source our projects under either MIT (client libs) and Apache License v2.0 (server libs).

> The dream would be to have a great DX experience around using insert/update triggers to call Supabase functions to run background tasks

We have something for this: Function Hooks (soon to be renamed "Async Triggers")[0]. They are still in alpha, but the extension [1] is getting close. It was important to build something which works with PG background workers so that it's non-blocking. We'll make quick progress on this now that we've released Edge Functions.

> sending notifications or updating related rows

Tune in for tomorrow's announcement - it's related.

[0] Function Hooks / Async Triggers: https://supabase.com/blog/2021/07/30/supabase-functions-upda...

[1] https://github.com/supabase/pg_net

I never really got graphql until I stumbled upon Wundergraph. (https://github.com/wundergraph/wundergraph). I have no affiliation with them except that I have been building an app with it. I'm honestly puzzled how it's not more popular. Maybe people are solving these problems in other ways? But I tried out a bunch of stuff: Vapor, Supabase, Hasura, etc. None of it simplifies building complex systems the way WG does.

I think their takes on graphql make sense: https://wundergraph.com/blog/graphql_is_not_meant_to_be_expo...

To demonstrate field usage metrics in Federation, I’ll be using WunderGraph Cosmo — a fully open source, fully self-hostable platform for Federation V1/V2 that is a drop in replacement for Apollo GraphOS.

The inverse is also true. As a technical founder, and maybe even an introvert like me, you should definitely look for a non-technical co-founder who can help you with networking, etc... I found my dream co-founder through YC Co-founder match and what can I say, it's going great. We're focusing on enterprise GraphQL/API solutions (https://wundergraph.com) and I benefit from the networking and communication abilities of Stefan, while I answer all technical questions. Tldr, I highly recommend to team up with people who complement your skills.

GraphQL Gateway is primarily responsible for serving GraphQL queries to consumers. It takes a query from a client, breaks it into smaller sub-queries, and executes that plan by proxying calls to the appropriate downstream subgraphs. When we started our journey, there was only Apollo Federation in the arena, and we used it. Still, now you can look at other options (e.g. Mercurius, Conductor, Hot Chocolate, Wundergraph, Hasura Remote Schemas), compare benchmarks and decide what's important and preferable for your needs. The Gateway provides a unified API for consumers while giving backend engineers flexibility and service isolation.

I'm a big fan of tRPC. It's amazing how it pushed TypeScript only stacks to the limit in terms of DX. Additionally, it made the GraphQL community aware of the limitations and tradeoffs of the Query language. At the same time, I think tRPC went through a really fast hype cycle and it doesn't look like we're seeing a massive move away from REST and GraphQL to RPC. That said, we see a lot of interest in RPC these days as we've adopted some ideas from tRPC and the old NextJS. In our BFF framework (https://wundergraph.com/) we've combined file based routing with RPC. In addition to tRPC, we're automatically generating a JSON Schema for each operation and an OpenAPI spec for the whole set of operations. People quite like this approach because you can easily share a set of RPC endpoints as an OpenAPI spec or postman collection. In addition, there are no discussions around HTTP verbs and such, there's only really queries, mutations and subscriptions. I'm curious what other people's experiences are with GraphQL, REST and RPC style APIs? What are you using these days and how many people/teams are involved/using your apis?

You can check out the source code on GitHub and leave a star if you like it. Follow me on Twitter, or join the discussion on our Discord server.

If you like the work we're doing and want to support us, give us a star on GitHub.