pool-conduit
Persistence interface for Haskell allowing multiple storage methods. (by yesodweb)
eventstore
EventStore Haskell TCP Client (by YoEight)
Our great sponsors
| pool-conduit | eventstore | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | - | |
| 455 | 77 | |
| 0.9% | - | |
| 7.5 | 1.7 | |
| 3 months ago | over 2 years ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pool-conduit
Posts with mentions or reviews of pool-conduit.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-06.
-
Problem with Persistent.runSqlPool and Servant Handel
I understand that the "new" version of Persistent requires Servant Handler to be MonadUnliftIO which is not the case. I also understand that I am suppose to use acquireSqlConn somehowe (following this this), but I can't figure it out. Any ideas ?
-
Was simplified subsumption worth it for industry Haskell programmers?
I don't think there's any malicious intent. It seems pretty clear that the motivation here is to simplify the type checker considerably, which is a really good reason to do something. Heck, I've got an open issue for deleting a feature in persistent which (according to the lack of comments on the issue) only ever used by persistent's own test suite.
-
[ANNOUNCE] GHC 9.2.2 is now available!
PR submitted: https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent/pull/1366 :)
- Simple Servant + Persistent + Katip template for starting a new project
-
Async Control Flow
Ha, I spotted a possible resource leak here. If stmtFinalize fail, then the connection won't be closed.
-
Using a different version of a package than what exists in resolver.
text Cloning b1e32adfe1da49cd9df997a13bd0c5b391486f5c from https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent.git No cabal file found for Repo from https://github.com/yesodweb/persistent.git, commit b1e32adfe1da49cd9df997a13bd0c5b391486f5c
eventstore
Posts with mentions or reviews of eventstore.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning eventstore yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing pool-conduit and eventstore you can also consider the following projects:
hocilib - A lightweight Haskell binding to the OCILIB C API
influxdb - InfluxDB client library for Haskell
persistent-odbc - uses persistent connecting via hdbc odbc
yxdb-utils - Utilities for parsing Alteryx Database format
HongoDB - A Simple Key Value Store
mysql-haskell - Pure haskell mysql driver
HDBC - Haskell Database Connectivity
postgresql-orm - An Haskell ORM (Object Relational Mapping) and migrations DSL for PostgreSQL.
persistent-relational-record - Persistent adapter for Haskell Relational Record
classy-influxdb-simple
presto-hdbc - Presto HDBC Connector
pool-conduit vs hocilib
eventstore vs influxdb
pool-conduit vs persistent-odbc
eventstore vs yxdb-utils
pool-conduit vs HongoDB
eventstore vs mysql-haskell
pool-conduit vs HDBC
eventstore vs postgresql-orm
pool-conduit vs persistent-relational-record
eventstore vs classy-influxdb-simple
pool-conduit vs presto-hdbc
eventstore vs HongoDB