pega-texto VS packcc

Compare pega-texto vs packcc and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
pega-texto packcc
2 2
17 325
- -
0.0 7.3
about 2 years ago about 1 month ago
C C
The Unlicense GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

pega-texto

Posts with mentions or reviews of pega-texto. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-18.

packcc

Posts with mentions or reviews of packcc. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-12.
  • A glimpse into the universe where Windows died with the 1980s
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Mar 2024
    There are languages with perfectly clean grammars which can't be parsed by yacc because they aren't LALR(1).

    I agree that a command processor should have a grammar that can be expressed in a well-known formalism, and its parser generated by a parser generator.

    I agree that both POSIX shell and CMD.EXE are flawed because that isn't true.

    What I'm disagreeing with, is that it is important that the grammar formalism be LALR(1) in particular, and that the parser generator be yacc in particular.

    Suppose I have a Packrat parser generator. [0] And my command processor has a nice clean PEG grammar. And I use the Packrat parser generator to generate the parser of my command processor. That grammar quite possibly isn't LALR(1), and hence yacc in particular won't be able to generate a parser for it. But what's the problem with that? If it is a problem at all, it is a very different problem than the problem that CMD.EXE and POSIX shell have

    [0] e.g. https://github.com/arithy/packcc

  • PackCC a PEG parser generator for C
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Jan 2023

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pega-texto and packcc you can also consider the following projects:

stb - stb single-file public domain libraries for C/C++

rust-peg - Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG) parser generator for Rust

npeg - PEGs for Nim, another take

PeppaPEG - PEG Parser in ANSI C

cparse - cparse is an LR(1) and LALR(1) parser generator

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured