.dotfiles VS vim-dirvish

Here are my dotfiles for reference.

If ALE does not already have an integration for a linter or an LSP, I can simply define my own custom integration.

But, for me, I find a mouse-free workflow to be better suited for tmux. I have this keybinding to capture content of the current pane, grep for URLs, filter them through fzf, then finally pass the results to open:

I have something similar in my ~/.vim/vimrc:

I usually set makeprg and errorformat in ~/.vim/after/compiler/*.vim and set the compiler as well as other file type-specific options in ~/.vim/after/ftplugin/*.vim , like

If you liked this guide, you may find more useful/interesting things in my vimrc and/or in my custom git subcommands.

Similar to how you can print any information in a .bash_prompt via custom bash functions, so too can we implement a function that is invoked as a git sub-command via aliases.

Check out my vimrc for more examples of vim-native implementations of some common plugins.

For more vim goodies, check out my vimrc.

It is cool but not unique. vim-dirvish has existed for Vim since a long time.

vin-dirvish fits your requirements.

I use vim-dirvish(you probably want to pair this with vim-enunch), it's a more minimal version of Netrw.

There is the built-in file browser, netrw, but I switched from that to vim-dirvish to lir.nvim to oil.nvim. These are file browsers, not file trees, and my preference for them is probably because I became accustomed to netrw after using it for so long.

vim-dirvish (great NetRW alternative)

file managers or project/directory viewer

vim-dirvish

There's also a minimal alternative if you're interested lir.nvim. Although I still use vim-dirvish because it meets all my needs.

I use dirvish, but netrw is often sufficient