paseto-ts VS nestjs-boilerplate

Might I suggest Paseto (https://paseto.io/) - it solves a lot of the headaches of JWT. Signing and encryption are two different things that require two different sets of keys, so you can't mess it up.

(Full disclosure, I've written one implementation: https://github.com/auth70/paseto-ts)

As you can see, from the above mentioned features, this boilerplate significantly reduces the startup time for your project (approximately 193 hours), making it a worthwhile consideration. Categories: Feature-Rich Boilerplates, Boilerplates with Auth and Registration, Frontend-Only (and has a fully compatible backend boilerplate, thus can be used as Full-Stack Boilerplates), Free.

How much time do we typically spend on project setup? We're talking about configuring installed libraries and writing boilerplate code to structure and implement best practices for achieving optimal website performance. At Brocoders, we often start new projects from scratch. That's why over 3 years ago, we created a NestJS boilerplate for the backend so that we wouldn't have to spend time developing core functionality that the end user doesn't see but is crucial for developers. Over this time, the boilerplate has received 1.9k stars on GitHub and has gained significant popularity beyond our company. Now, we've decided to take it a step further and created the Extensive React Boilerplate for the frontend. Its purpose is to keep our best practices in project development together, avoiding familiar pitfalls and reducing development time.

Our idea was to run our Brocoders Nest.js Boilerplate on Bun and see how it performs. The test was made on MacBook Pro 2GHz, 16Gb memory:

It includes all necessary features for auth (sign in, sign up, social sign up, confirm email, forgot password and roles) and file uploading (this allows one endpoint for file uploading and then attach it to any other entity). I decided to have it from the box, because all the projects we started required these features.