Parsedown
cms
Parsedown | cms | |
---|---|---|
7 | 33 | |
14,650 | 3,404 | |
- | 1.8% | |
4.8 | 9.9 | |
8 days ago | 3 days ago | |
PHP | PHP | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Parsedown
- Parsedown: Better Markdown Parser in PHP
- What is your tech stack for blog websites? (not wordpress)
- PHP in 2023
-
Let's create a Markdown editor just like dev.to
So for parsing the data we will use parsedown It is written in PHP which is actually 6x faster than normal parsers... So I think this is best for parsing our data
-
Markdown library that supports disabling many features?
Yeah, I ended up finding https://github.com/erusev/parsedown/issues/229 during my research. It's an acceptable option, but I was hoping I missed something even better. Thank you!
-
What does Laravel use for its documentation?
Looks like they use Parsedown
-
How markdown emails work in Laravel using `league/commonmark` package
The first package used to parse markdown was erusev/parsedown
cms
- Statamic – modern, clean, and highly adaptable CMS built on Laravel
-
9 best Git-based CMS platforms for your next project
Statamic is one of the best flat-file CMSs. It’s built with Laravel and can be used as a headless Git-based CMS as well. The paid professional version allows you to use REST APIs and GraphQL APIs for content management and offers a GitHub integration for content storage and editorial workflows.
- Casidoo on TinaCMS
-
Ask HN: What are some well-designed websites?
Aah, that's always a controversial question, on one hand, some universal rules of usability do exist, but on the other hand, everyone's habits, taste and use cases are very different.
The most neutral definition of a "well designed" website, without any further context, could be "created in a way that helps users achieve intended goals efficiently, while keeping max number of users happy about its look".
Again, different audiences will have very different answers. Here at HN, sites like https://www.mcmaster.com/ and https://www.craigslist.org win – because HN users appreciate old look and how efficient these sites are.
https://www.apple.com/ is an industry standard of a marketing site for consumer tech. It's not universally "well designed".
Other examples of well done marketing pages: https://www.sketch.com/ ; https://statamic.com/ ; https://linear.app/ got its share of hype recently.
Other times, a website is well designed because its content is awesome and is easy to consume. See https://ciechanow.ski/ and https://www.joshwcomeau.com/
Is https://github.com/ well designed? As an amateur developers, I'd say yes.
Is https://htmx.org/ well designed? Hmm, at a glance, there's no design at all. Is no design also design? That's a rabbit hole.
P.S. I often hear my website is well-designed :-)
-
Different flavors of content management
Local CMSs are the ones that are mostly file-based (like Statamic or Astro). This means that you can edit everything locally and deploy the data. This way, our CMS is more secure, but on the downside, you have to have a local server working, and you might experience more conflicts, especially when two people will work on the same article (although Git might save you from many of those). It also means that there is a higher learning curve. A remote CMS works somewhere on a server, and most users don't care how.
-
Looking for a simple CMS recommendation
I use Statamic, the free version will do everything your looking for and it can be as simple or as complex as you need it to be. It's flat file based (by default) too so deployment / version control is super easy.
-
What is your tech stack for blog websites? (not wordpress)
Statamic (PHP / Laravel)
-
WP20 and Audrey Scholars – Matt Mullenweg
I'm not in the market for a CMS but if I were I'd likely go with https://statamic.com/ if I needed to build something from scratch.
-
Go with PHP
If you're looking for a great CMS and were bitten by WordPress back in the day, you should take a look at Statamic (https://statamic.com)
It's a Laravel package and it's the best CMS I've ever used (from a dev perspective). v4 just dropped the other day
-
Software for personal website
https://statamic.com free for personal. Your welcome.
What are some alternatives?
CommonMark PHP - Highly-extensible PHP Markdown parser which fully supports the CommonMark and GFM specs.
CRUD - Build custom admin panels. Fast!
PHP Markdown - Parser for Markdown and Markdown Extra derived from the original Markdown.pl by John Gruber.
laravel-localization - Easy localization for Laravel
HTML to Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown with PHP
jigsaw - Simple static sites with Laravel’s Blade.
Emoji - A simple PHP library for handling Emoji
cms - Multilingual PHP CMS built with Laravel and bootstrap
Cebe Markdown - A super fast, highly extensible markdown parser for PHP
WonderCMS - Fast and small flat file CMS (5 files). Built with PHP, JSON database.
A HTML DOM parser written in PHP - 📜 Modern Simple HTML DOM Parser for PHP
bulma-blade-ui - A set of Laravel Blade components for the Bulma frontend framework