packages.redbeardlab.com VS community

Compare packages.redbeardlab.com vs community and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
packages.redbeardlab.com community
1 2
5 42
- -
4.7 6.4
over 3 years ago 12 days ago
Dockerfile
- Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

packages.redbeardlab.com

Posts with mentions or reviews of packages.redbeardlab.com. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2020-12-26.
  • Run More Stuff in Docker
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Dec 2020
    http://packages.redbeardlab.com

    On the GitHub repo where you can ask for more packages to be installed:

    https://github.com/RedBeardLab/packages.redbeardlab.com/

    And in this pair or articles for specific languages

    Golang:

community

Posts with mentions or reviews of community. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-08.
  • Buildpacks vs. Dockerfiles
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Feb 2021
    A list of adopters (many of which are hosting providers) is here: https://github.com/buildpacks/community/blob/main/ADOPTERS.m...
  • Run More Stuff in Docker
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Dec 2020
    Many comments here point out how difficult it is to manage a separate dependency stack for each container when you use Dockerfiles to build them. This problem is just as difficult, time-intensive, and security-critical for microservice apps running on K8s as it is for CLI tools and graphical apps.

    Worth pointing out that there is an incubating CNCF project that tries to solve this problem by forgoing Dockerfiles entirely: Cloud Native Buildpacks (https://buildpacks.io)

    CNB defines safe seams between OCI image layers so that can be replaced out of order, directly on any Docker registry (only JSON requests), and en-mass. This means you can, e.g., instantly update all of your OS packages for your 1000+ containers without running any builds, as long as you use an LTS distribution with strong ABI promises (e.g., Ubuntu 20.04). Most major cloud vendors have quietly adopted it, especially for function builds: https://github.com/buildpacks/community/blob/main/ADOPTERS.m...

    You might recognize "buildpacks" from Heroku, and in fact the project was started several years ago in the CNCF by the folks who maintained the Heroku and Cloud Foundry buildpacks in the pre-Dockerfile era.

    [Disclaimer: I'm one of the founders of the project, on the VMware (formerly Cloud Foundry) side.]

What are some alternatives?

When comparing packages.redbeardlab.com and community you can also consider the following projects:

whalebrew - Homebrew, but with Docker images

rules_docker - Rules for building and handling Docker images with Bazel

macondo - generic, polyglot commands platform

nodejs - A Cloud Native Buildpack for Node.JS

distroless - 🥑 Language focused docker images, minus the operating system.

cutlass - Write CNB integration tests for Pack in Ruby with cutlass

hadolint - Dockerfile linter, validate inline bash, written in Haskell

go - A Cloud Native Buildpack for Go

bocker - Docker implemented in around 100 lines of bash

podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.

feed-test