org-ref VS reproducible_papers

Compare org-ref vs reproducible_papers and see what are their differences.

org-ref

org-mode modules for citations, cross-references, bibliographies in org-mode and useful bibtex tools to go with it. (by jkitchin)

reproducible_papers

Automate computations, plotting, and LaTeX with Makefiles. (by jpreiss)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
org-ref reproducible_papers
27 1
1,339 15
- -
7.6 6.5
9 days ago about 1 month ago
Emacs Lisp Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 only -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

org-ref

Posts with mentions or reviews of org-ref. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-20.

reproducible_papers

Posts with mentions or reviews of reproducible_papers. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-21.
  • Ask HN: Whats you're ideal PhD workflow
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Aug 2021
    My main workflow improvement over the course of my PhD has been making my papers reproducible. This means: I can clone a github repo and in a single command, re-run all computations, re-generate all figures and tables, and compile the final paper.

    Any manual step like "resize the figure window until the proportions look good" or "run script A, then run script B", or "upload this file to Overleaf" creates an opportunity for your results (figures and tables) to become out of sync with your source code. This can cause big problems.

    I use Makefiles to accomplish this [1], but the exact techniques don't matter. The main point is the end goal.

    More broadly, in research it's always tempting to do things quick and dirty. Conference deadlines loom. Code bases are usually small and short-lived. But in my experience, your 4-months-later future self will appreciate tests, documentation, etc. just as much as your 4-years-later future self.

    You can still be quick and dirty when it comes to project scope. This is where you get most of the speedup anyway. Go ahead write a function that doesn't handle edge cases, but add a comment about it!

    [1] https://github.com/jpreiss/reproducible_papers

What are some alternatives?

When comparing org-ref and reproducible_papers you can also consider the following projects:

citar - Emacs package to quickly find and act on bibliographic references, and edit org, markdown, and latex academic documents.

helm-bibtex - Search and manage bibliographies in Emacs

sioyek - Sioyek is a PDF viewer with a focus on textbooks and research papers

citeproc-org - Renders Org-mode citations in CSL styles using citeproc-el.

dendron - The personal knowledge management (PKM) tool that grows as you do!

ox-pandoc - Another org-mode exporter via pandoc.

org-roam - Rudimentary Roam replica with Org-mode

emacs-for-writers - Emacs configuration for writers. Focus on story development and structured writing.

pandoc - Universal markup converter

literate-calc-mode.el - 🧮 Literate programming for M-x calc

scimax - An emacs starterkit for scientists and engineers

tufte-org-mode - An Org mode environment for producing Tufte-LaTeX books and handouts