opentofu
OpenVPN
opentofu | OpenVPN | |
---|---|---|
41 | 82 | |
20,847 | 9,996 | |
7.9% | 1.7% | |
9.8 | 9.2 | |
about 21 hours ago | 7 days ago | |
Go | C | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
opentofu
-
OpenTofu v1.7: Enhanced Security with State File Encryption
and more.
-
OpenTofu 1.7.0 is out with State Encryption, Dynamic Provider-defined Functions
Hey!
> With OpenTofu exclusive features making such an early debut, is the intention to remain a superset of upstream Terraform functionality and spec, or allow OpenTofu to diverge and move in its own direction?
The intention is to let it diverge. There will surely be some amount of shared new features, but we're generally going our own way.
> Will you aim to stick to compatibility with Terraform providers/modules?
Yes.
Regarding providers, we might introduce some kind of superset protocol for providers at some point, for tofu-exclusive functionality, but we'll make sure to design it in a way where providers keep working with both Terraform and OpenTofu.
Regarding modules, this one will be more tricky, as there might Terraform languages features that aren't supported in OpenTofu and vice-versa. We have a proposal[0] to tackle this, and enable module authors to easily create modules with support for both, even when using some exclusive features of any one of them.
> Is the potential impact of community fragmentation on your mind as many commercial users who donβt care about open source ideology stick to the tried-and-true Hashicorp Terraform?
We've talked to a lot of people, and we've met many who see the license changes as a risk for them, while OpenTofu, with its open-source nature, is the less-risky choice. That includes large enterprises.
> Is there any intention to try and supplement the tooling around the core product to provide an answer to features like Terraform Cloud dashboard, sentinel policies and other things companies may want out of the product outside of the command line tool itself?
That's mostly covered by the companies sponsoring OpenTofu's development: Spacelift (I work here), env0, Scalr, Harness, Gruntworks.
[0]: https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1328
- IBM to Acquire HashiCorp, Inc
-
IBM Planning to Acquire HashiCorp
Please remember to file in a calm and orderly fashion toward the exits and remember: IBM killed Centos for profit.
Terraform users can pick up their new alternative here:
https://opentofu.org/
and for those of you with Vault, you can find your new alternative here:
https://openbao.org/
-
Grant Kubernetes Pods Access to AWS Services Using OpenID Connect
OpenTofu v1.6
-
Terraform vs. AWS CloudFormation
Note: New versions of Terraform will be placed under the BUSL license, but everything created before version 1.5.x stays open-source. OpenTofu is an open-source version of Terraform that will expand on Terraform's existing concepts and offerings. It is a viable alternative to HashiCorp's Terraform, being forked from Terraform version 1.5.6. OpenTofu retained all the features and functionalities that had made Terraform popular among developers while also introducing improvements and enhancements. OpenTofu is not going to have its own providers and modules, but it is going to use its own registry for them.
-
Why CISA Is Warning CISOs About a Breach at Sisense
opentofu is solving this with proper state encryption support: https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/874
- OpenTofu Response to HashiCorp's Cease and Desist Letter
- Ask HN: What's better Terraform or AWS CDK?
-
OpenTofu: The Open Source Terraform Alternative
As with all other Linux Foundation and CNCF projects, OpenTofu is guided by the Technical Steering Committee(TSC), which works in open collaboration with the community on the development of new features, upgrades, bug fixes, etc. The current TSC consists of representatives from Harness, Spacelift, Scalr, Gruntworks, and env0.
OpenVPN
- Critical OpenVPN Zero-Day Flaws
-
Ask HN: Who is hiring? (October 2023)
OpenVPN is hiring! https://openvpn.net/
C++ Developer in the United States. Full-time| Fully remote| Flexible work schedules
Link to look at vacancy details and apply:
-
Are there any work arounds for the Netflix new "household" system?
How you connect to your modem will depend on the device you are using, but for windows laptops as an example you download the OpenVPN program and input your modem details there, much like you would any other vpn service. I think there would be some guides on youtube. https://openvpn.net/
-
Can i use PFSense to control incoming user connections (without a vpn?)
I just started playing with CloudConnexa for remotely managing my second pFSense. Really nice and is free for up to 3 concurrent users. https://openvpn.net. Can also self-host OpenVPN access server with a free 2 concurrent license.
-
Is the 7spotlight Markle family interview airing now? Is anyone watching and can provide comment? ππΊ
If anyone is being blocked check out free OpenVPN
-
gluetunvpn docker help
It is likely an issue with the 'cipher' options, if any, that are in your ".opvn" file. This is telling you that the opvn setting is not finding a matching cipher it is allowed to use. The fix per the message would be to add the Servers cipher to your options. https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn-gui/issues/381 https://github.com/OpenVPN/openvpn/blob/master/doc/man-sections/cipher-negotiation.rst
-
Is it possible for a sysadmin to block only some packets from a VPN connection ?
I too haven't used the client-nat directive in some years (I currently implement 1:1 NAT with pfsense to access my network because I'm too lazy to change the networks subnet from the default) so I decided to retest and it does appear that OpenVPN Connect clients do not properly support the client-nat directive but the traditional OpenVPN server/clients still do. I've just tested this on OpenVPN 2.6.3 Server, OpenVPN 2.6.1 GUI for Windows from openvpn.net, and OpenVPN Connect iOS 3.3.3 and only the OpenVPN Connect client has any difficulty. Difficulty being that you can use client-nat successfully but it has to be configured server-side it can't be pushed to or setup on the client (OpenVPN Connect) side. The Server and Windows (non-OpenVPN Connect) clients work an any setup whether it's configured server-side, pushed to the client, or set up in the client config.
-
WebUI not accessible, even with port opened
Ask openvpn.net for commercial support: https://support.openvpn.com/
-
My Installed App as Developer
OpenVPN is a VPN client that I used primarily for work. We used VPN to connect to the dev server and we are using VPN. I also sometimes used that to open websites that got blocked in Indonesia like Reddit.
-
minexmr2.com updated to p2pool v3.1, monerod v0.18.2.0, and ready for Mar 18 p2pool (not monero) hardfork
I connect all the servers with secure OpenVPN private network. And block unused ports anywhere with ufw.
What are some alternatives?
datadog-static-analyzer - Datadog Static Analyzer
tinc - a VPN daemon
adoptium
Pritunl - Enterprise VPN server
hnrss - Custom, realtime RSS feeds for Hacker News
ocserv
tabby - Self-hosted AI coding assistant
tailscale - The easiest, most secure way to use WireGuard and 2FA.
Cap'n Proto - Cap'n Proto serialization/RPC system - core tools and C++ library
openvpn3-linux - OpenVPN 3 Linux client
awesome-ai-safety - π A curated list of papers & technical articles on AI Quality & Safety
SoftEther - Cross-platform multi-protocol VPN software. Pull requests are welcome. The stable version is available at https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN_Stable.