opentofu
coolify
opentofu | coolify | |
---|---|---|
41 | 113 | |
20,847 | 16,289 | |
8.6% | 27.6% | |
9.8 | 10.0 | |
1 day ago | 1 day ago | |
Go | PHP | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
opentofu
-
OpenTofu v1.7: Enhanced Security with State File Encryption
and more.
-
OpenTofu 1.7.0 is out with State Encryption, Dynamic Provider-defined Functions
Hey!
> With OpenTofu exclusive features making such an early debut, is the intention to remain a superset of upstream Terraform functionality and spec, or allow OpenTofu to diverge and move in its own direction?
The intention is to let it diverge. There will surely be some amount of shared new features, but we're generally going our own way.
> Will you aim to stick to compatibility with Terraform providers/modules?
Yes.
Regarding providers, we might introduce some kind of superset protocol for providers at some point, for tofu-exclusive functionality, but we'll make sure to design it in a way where providers keep working with both Terraform and OpenTofu.
Regarding modules, this one will be more tricky, as there might Terraform languages features that aren't supported in OpenTofu and vice-versa. We have a proposal[0] to tackle this, and enable module authors to easily create modules with support for both, even when using some exclusive features of any one of them.
> Is the potential impact of community fragmentation on your mind as many commercial users who don’t care about open source ideology stick to the tried-and-true Hashicorp Terraform?
We've talked to a lot of people, and we've met many who see the license changes as a risk for them, while OpenTofu, with its open-source nature, is the less-risky choice. That includes large enterprises.
> Is there any intention to try and supplement the tooling around the core product to provide an answer to features like Terraform Cloud dashboard, sentinel policies and other things companies may want out of the product outside of the command line tool itself?
That's mostly covered by the companies sponsoring OpenTofu's development: Spacelift (I work here), env0, Scalr, Harness, Gruntworks.
[0]: https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/1328
- IBM to Acquire HashiCorp, Inc
-
IBM Planning to Acquire HashiCorp
Please remember to file in a calm and orderly fashion toward the exits and remember: IBM killed Centos for profit.
Terraform users can pick up their new alternative here:
https://opentofu.org/
and for those of you with Vault, you can find your new alternative here:
https://openbao.org/
-
Grant Kubernetes Pods Access to AWS Services Using OpenID Connect
OpenTofu v1.6
-
Terraform vs. AWS CloudFormation
Note: New versions of Terraform will be placed under the BUSL license, but everything created before version 1.5.x stays open-source. OpenTofu is an open-source version of Terraform that will expand on Terraform's existing concepts and offerings. It is a viable alternative to HashiCorp's Terraform, being forked from Terraform version 1.5.6. OpenTofu retained all the features and functionalities that had made Terraform popular among developers while also introducing improvements and enhancements. OpenTofu is not going to have its own providers and modules, but it is going to use its own registry for them.
-
Why CISA Is Warning CISOs About a Breach at Sisense
opentofu is solving this with proper state encryption support: https://github.com/opentofu/opentofu/issues/874
- OpenTofu Response to HashiCorp's Cease and Desist Letter
- Ask HN: What's better Terraform or AWS CDK?
-
OpenTofu: The Open Source Terraform Alternative
As with all other Linux Foundation and CNCF projects, OpenTofu is guided by the Technical Steering Committee(TSC), which works in open collaboration with the community on the development of new features, upgrades, bug fixes, etc. The current TSC consists of representatives from Harness, Spacelift, Scalr, Gruntworks, and env0.
coolify
- Open-source alternative to Heroku, Vercel, and Netlify
-
Deploy SvelteKit with SSR on Coolify (Hetzner VPS)
This is my first quick try deploying SvelteKit with the open source software Coolify by Andras Bacsai.
-
Standalone Next.js. When serverless is not an option
With a serverful approach, you can avoid these drawbacks, and the main challenge lies in selecting the platform that aligns with your requirements. Options may include AWS, Render, DigitalOcean, and others. While VPS is also an option, it's generally not recommended due to the significant setup and maintenance overhead involved (logging, monitoring, CI/CD pipelines, etc.). However, you can make your life easier by leveraging tools like Coolify that help managing your VPS.
-
Let's build a screenshot API
Heroku and similar providers can simplify the server management issues, but you can use something much better that can combine both cost efficiency and ease of deployment—Coolify:
-
Quantum alternatives - coolify and meli
3 projects | 12 Mar 2024
-
Serverless Horrors
> VPSs being “easy to manage” is a strong option full of assumptions.
There are definitely many footguns with managing a VPS but I think the threshold to get vaguely competent with a VPS is not really that far off with getting familiar with the average cloud platform - which comes with its own dangers, like the near-total inability to put an upward cap on fees that that person found out with Netlify recently.
Having a $5 VPS and knowing it's never going to cost your more than $5 might balance out a lot of things on the other side for a lot of people.
(And, as a bonus, it comes with the benefit of having a better idea of what is going on on the actual computer which is running your code.)
Platforms like https://coolify.io/ (which I have not tried, but looks interesting) seem to give you some of the abstractions that you get in cloud platforms to save you having to mess with too much low level stuff and become an expert in a billion separate systems.
If you have Debian with automatic updates that does most of the heavy lifting for you. The hardest problem I have is resisting the temptation to just install everything, because the cost to do it is capped at my VPS monthly fee.
So yep, it comes with a lot of assumptions. But so does everything!
-
Netlify just sent me a $104K bill for a simple static site
https://coolify.io/ might be worth a look
-
The 2024 Web Hosting Report
The modern iteration of these tools has taken the developer experience learnings from the Platform as a Service (PaaS) category, and will bring them to your own VM, giving you your own personal PaaS. Example of this include Dokku, Coolify, Caprover, Cloud66 and many more!
- Coolify – Self-Hostable PaaS
- Open-source and self-hostable Heroku/Netlify alternative
What are some alternatives?
datadog-static-analyzer - Datadog Static Analyzer
CapRover - Scalable PaaS (automated Docker+nginx) - aka Heroku on Steroids
adoptium
Dokku - A docker-powered PaaS that helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications
hnrss - Custom, realtime RSS feeds for Hacker News
porter - Kubernetes powered PaaS that runs in your own cloud.
tabby - Self-hosted AI coding assistant
meli - Platform for deploying static sites and frontend applications easily. Automatic SSL, deploy previews, reverse proxy, and more.
Cap'n Proto - Cap'n Proto serialization/RPC system - core tools and C++ library
Empire - Empire is a PowerShell and Python post-exploitation agent.
awesome-ai-safety - 📚 A curated list of papers & technical articles on AI Quality & Safety
pack - CLI for building apps using Cloud Native Buildpacks