opentelemetry-collector-contrib VS terraform

The open telemetry collector does just that. https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-co...

There are two official distributions of the OpenTelemetry Collector: Core, and Contrib.

Maybe, you are asking yourself: "But I already had instrumented my applications with vendor-specific libraries and I'm using their agents and monitoring tools, why should I change to OpenTelemetry?". The answer is: maybe you're right and I don't want to encourage you to update the way how you are doing observability in your applications, that's a hard and complex task. But, if you are starting from scratch or you are not happy with your current observability infrastructure, OpenTelemetry is the best choice, independently of the backend telemetry tool that you are using. I would like to invite you to take a look at the number of exporters available in the collector contrib section, if your backend tracing tool is not there, probably it's already using the Open Telemetry Protocol (OTLP) and you will be able to use the core collector. Otherwise, you should consider changing your backend telemetry tool or contributing to the project creating a new exporter.

To receive OTLP data, you set up the standard otlp receiver to receive data in HTTP or gRPC format. To forward traces and metrics, a batch processor was defined to accumulate data and send it every 100 milliseconds. Then set up a connection to Tempo (in otlp/tempo exporter, with a standard top exporter) and to Prometheus (in prometheus exporter, with a control exporter). A debug exporter also was added to log info on container standard I/O and see how the collector is working.

Thanks for the reply. Would the Spotlight sidecar possibly be able to run independently and consume spans emitted by the Sentry exporter[0] or some other similar flow beyond strictly exporting directly from the Sentry SDK provided by Spotlight?

This tooling looks really cool and I'd love to play around with it, but am already pretty entrenched into OTel and funneling data through the collector and don't want to introduce too much additional overhead for devs.

[0] https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-co...

A list of all metric definitions can be found here.

receivers: otlp: protocols: grpc: endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317 http: endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318 hostmetrics: collection_interval: 60s scrapers: cpu: {} disk: {} load: {} filesystem: {} memory: {} network: {} paging: {} process: mute_process_name_error: true mute_process_exe_error: true mute_process_io_error: true processes: {} prometheus: config: global: scrape_interval: 60s scrape_configs: - job_name: otel-collector-binary scrape_interval: 60s static_configs: - targets: ["localhost:8889>"] - job_name: "jvm-metrics" scrape_interval: 10s metrics_path: "/actuator/prometheus" static_configs: - targets: ["localhost:8090>"] processors: batch: send_batch_size: 1000 timeout: 10s # Ref: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-contrib/blob/main/processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/README.md resourcedetection: detectors: [env, system] # Before system detector, include ec2 for AWS, gcp for GCP and azure for Azure. # Using OTEL_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTES envvar, env detector adds custom labels. timeout: 2s system: hostname_sources: [os] # alternatively, use [dns,os] for setting FQDN as host.name and os as fallback extensions: health_check: {} zpages: {} exporters: otlp: endpoint: "ingest.{region}.signoz.cloud:443" tls: insecure: false headers: "signoz-access-token": logging: verbosity: normal service: telemetry: metrics: address: 0.0.0.0:8888 extensions: [health_check, zpages] pipelines: metrics: receivers: [otlp] processors: [batch] exporters: [otlp] metrics/internal: receivers: [prometheus, hostmetrics] processors: [resourcedetection, batch] exporters: [otlp] traces: receivers: [otlp] processors: [batch] exporters: [otlp] logs: receivers: [otlp] processors: [batch] exporters: [otlp]

If you are using the prometheus exporter, you can use the transform processor to get specific resource attributes into metric labels.

With the advantage that you get only the specific attributes you want, thus avoiding a cardinality explosion.

https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-co...

OpenTelemetry Operators

I am not only a big fan of hashicorp terraform. I'm also one of the early adopters of it. So this is my main go-to Infrastructure as a Code tool. However all the resources I use are supported by other IaaC solutions such as AWS CloudFormation and AWS CDK. You definitely got to use one to avoid loosing the track of resources you create.

State Encryption was one of those long requested features[0] (I had it on my ideas list for years[1]) that Hashicorp didn't have much incentive to build. I don't think it has to with distancing opentofu as such, but the opentofu team prioritizing the right things that customers actually need.

[0]: https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/9556

[1]: https://github.com/captn3m0/ideas#-mars-terraform-remote-htt...

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/34402

I’m not a lawyer and have no idea who is right or wrong but I understand why Hashicorp is scrutinizing this.

Just to give an example of the power of Go for CLI builds, you may have already used or at least heard of Docker, Kubernetes, Prometheus, Terraform, but what do they all have in common? They all have a large part of their usability via CLI and are developed in Go 🐿.

Each app’s front end is built with Qwik and uses Tailwind for styling. The server-side is powered by Qwik City (Qwik’s official meta-framework) and runs on Node.js hosted on a shared Linode VPS. The apps also use PM2 for process management and Caddy as a reverse proxy and SSL provisioner. The data is stored in a PostgreSQL database that also runs on a shared Linode VPS. The apps interact with the database using Drizzle, an Object-Relational Mapper (ORM) for JavaScript. The entire infrastructure for both apps is managed with Terraform using the Terraform Linode provider, which was new to me, but made provisioning and destroying infrastructure really fast and easy (once I learned how it all worked).

For example, integrating Terraform for infrastructure as code (IaC) into the IDP can streamline updates and rollbacks.

In this project, you will understand and get hands on experience around the entire concept around CI/CD from applications perspective. To fully gain real expertise around this idea, it is best to see it in action across different programming languages and from the platform perspective too. From the application perspective, we will be focusing on PHP here; there are more projects ahead that are based on Java, Node.js, .Net and Python. By the time you start working on Terraform, Docker and Kubernetes projects, you will get to see the platform perspective of CI/CD in action.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is an important part of any true hosting operation in the public cloud. Each of these platforms has their own IaC solution, e.g. AWS CloudFormation. But they also support popular open-source IaC tools like Pulumi or Terraform. A category of tools that also needs to be discussed is API gateways and other app-specific load balancers. There are applications for internal consumption, which can be called microservices if you have a lot of them. And often microservices use advanced networking options such as a service mesh instead of just the native private network offered by a VPC.