openai-whisper-cpu VS yt-whisper

I feel the same.

For example some stats from Whisper [0] (audio transcoding) show the following for the medium model (see other models in the link):

---

GPU medium fp32 Linear 1.7s

CPU medium fp32 nn.Linear 60.7

CPU medium qint8 (quant) nn.Linear 23.1

---

So the same model runs 35.7 times faster on GPU, and compared to an CPU-optimized model still 13.6.

I was expecting around an order or magnitude of improvement. Then again, I do not know if in the case of this article the entire model was in the GPU, or just a fraction of it (22 layers), which might explain the result.

[0] https://github.com/MiscellaneousStuff/openai-whisper-cpu

According to https://github.com/MiscellaneousStuff/openai-whisper-cpu the medium model needs 1.7 seconds to transcribe 30 seconds of audio when run on a GPU.

There is a very simple method built-in to PyTorch which can give you over 3x speed improvement for the large model, which you could also combine with the method proposed in this post. https://github.com/MiscellaneousStuff/openai-whisper-cpu

For CPU inference, model quantization is a very easy to apply method with great average speedups which is already built-in to PyTorch. For example, I applied dynamic quantization to the OpenAI Whisper model (speech recognition) across a range of model sizes (ranging from tiny which had 39M params to large which had 1.5B params). Refer to the below table for performance increases:

GitHub

#28 transcribe local files

Or even better, yt-whisper, which uses OpenAI's Whisper speech to text. I guess it'd be better to first check whether the video has captions first before Whispering, so maybe both your command and this one could be used together.

https://github.com/m1guelpf/yt-whisper

With minimal changes to https://github.com/m1guelpf/yt-whisper i got a setup to transcribe subs from YouTube videos or local files bit it might take an hour or so running the large model on my CPU.