open-wc VS vite

npm init @open-wc@latest Need to install the following packages: @open-wc/[email protected] Ok to proceed? (y) y _.,,,,,,,,,._ .d'' ``b. Open Web Components Recommendations .p' Open `q. .d' Web Components `b. Start or upgrade your web component project with .d' `b. ease. All our recommendations at your fingertips. :: ................. :: `p. .q' `p. open-wc.org .q' `b. @openWc .d' `q.. ..,' See more details at https://open-wc.org/init/ '',,,,,,,,,,'' Note: you can exit any time with Ctrl+C or Esc ✔ What would you like to do today? › Scaffold a new project ✔ What would you like to scaffold? › Web Component ✔ What would you like to add? › Testing (web-test-runner) ✔ Would you like to use typescript? › Yes ✔ What is the tag name of your web component? … testing-components ./ ├── testing-components/ │ ├── .vscode/ │ │ └── extensions.json │ ├── demo/ │ │ └── index.html │ ├── src/ │ │ ├── index.ts │ │ ├── testing-components.ts │ │ └── TestingComponents.ts │ ├── test/ │ │ └── testing-components.test.ts │ ├── .editorconfig │ ├── .gitignore │ ├── LICENSE │ ├── package.json │ ├── README.md │ ├── tsconfig.json │ ├── web-dev-server.config.mjs │ └── web-test-runner.config.mjs ✔ Do you want to write this file structure to disk? › Yes Writing..... done ✔ Do you want to install dependencies? › Yes, with npm

Very much still a thing, https://open-wc.org/ is a good resource for examples and best practices.

I have this design system project for a company, I need to make web components and instead of using open-wc.org pre-built, I chose to go Vite.

Nice. We have data with meaning. Now let's create the presentation layer (aka the UI!) and then let's add interactivity to the UI, so we can have feedback when actually simulating an exam (aka the Frontend!). Since in ING we are advocates of Web Components, I always wanted to give this stack a try for side projects. I jumped right into open-wc.org and used the npm generator. Everything worked precisely as expected. It was a breeze since my Chapter is using lit every. single. day. So I could finally get some mileage myself, in writing lit. At work, as a Chapter Lead, I prefer to spend my time more effectively for the team, rather than coding new features by myself; my chapter does it better anyway (#proud).

I suggest following these best practices for creating a custom web element: https://open-wc.org/

Open Web Components is a great tool for accessing open-source web components and is very easy to set up with their quickstart guide and easy to understand documentation.

This application is one of many applications out there that are dipping their toes in the land of web components. Web components are still very new and ever-growing. While I have been developing on HAX-the-Web, I am also the Project Manager for HAXCamp 2022. < hax-camp > is an unconference dedicated to all things Web Components!This year's event is being student-run and we anticipate there being discussions about openwc, lit, performance, element composition, css, hax.psu, pedagogy, and design systems. If this work flow is something that you are interested in, I would encourage signing up for this event. It is much more than this, larger than you know and a way to connect with students, faculty, staff, and professional in the industry.

As of this writing, initializing a Hattip project requires some manual commands. However, keep in mind that a zero-config development environment based on Vite is in the works.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 4200, } })

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/