open-wc VS daisyui

npm init @open-wc@latest Need to install the following packages: @open-wc/[email protected] Ok to proceed? (y) y _.,,,,,,,,,._ .d'' ``b. Open Web Components Recommendations .p' Open `q. .d' Web Components `b. Start or upgrade your web component project with .d' `b. ease. All our recommendations at your fingertips. :: ................. :: `p. .q' `p. open-wc.org .q' `b. @openWc .d' `q.. ..,' See more details at https://open-wc.org/init/ '',,,,,,,,,,'' Note: you can exit any time with Ctrl+C or Esc ✔ What would you like to do today? › Scaffold a new project ✔ What would you like to scaffold? › Web Component ✔ What would you like to add? › Testing (web-test-runner) ✔ Would you like to use typescript? › Yes ✔ What is the tag name of your web component? … testing-components ./ ├── testing-components/ │ ├── .vscode/ │ │ └── extensions.json │ ├── demo/ │ │ └── index.html │ ├── src/ │ │ ├── index.ts │ │ ├── testing-components.ts │ │ └── TestingComponents.ts │ ├── test/ │ │ └── testing-components.test.ts │ ├── .editorconfig │ ├── .gitignore │ ├── LICENSE │ ├── package.json │ ├── README.md │ ├── tsconfig.json │ ├── web-dev-server.config.mjs │ └── web-test-runner.config.mjs ✔ Do you want to write this file structure to disk? › Yes Writing..... done ✔ Do you want to install dependencies? › Yes, with npm

Very much still a thing, https://open-wc.org/ is a good resource for examples and best practices.

I have this design system project for a company, I need to make web components and instead of using open-wc.org pre-built, I chose to go Vite.

Nice. We have data with meaning. Now let's create the presentation layer (aka the UI!) and then let's add interactivity to the UI, so we can have feedback when actually simulating an exam (aka the Frontend!). Since in ING we are advocates of Web Components, I always wanted to give this stack a try for side projects. I jumped right into open-wc.org and used the npm generator. Everything worked precisely as expected. It was a breeze since my Chapter is using lit every. single. day. So I could finally get some mileage myself, in writing lit. At work, as a Chapter Lead, I prefer to spend my time more effectively for the team, rather than coding new features by myself; my chapter does it better anyway (#proud).

I suggest following these best practices for creating a custom web element: https://open-wc.org/

Open Web Components is a great tool for accessing open-source web components and is very easy to set up with their quickstart guide and easy to understand documentation.

This application is one of many applications out there that are dipping their toes in the land of web components. Web components are still very new and ever-growing. While I have been developing on HAX-the-Web, I am also the Project Manager for HAXCamp 2022. < hax-camp > is an unconference dedicated to all things Web Components!This year's event is being student-run and we anticipate there being discussions about openwc, lit, performance, element composition, css, hax.psu, pedagogy, and design systems. If this work flow is something that you are interested in, I would encourage signing up for this event. It is much more than this, larger than you know and a way to connect with students, faculty, staff, and professional in the industry.

DaisyUI offers zero-JS components

https://daisyui.com/

I used it for a small form + search result list recently and it works well enough for simple / static stuff.

But I think I'll still be reaching for a JS lib first since I'd miss things like inputs-with-autocomplete too much.

Tailwind is great, but creating everything from scratch is annoying. A nice base of components which can be extended with tailwind would be great. There are a few tailwind frameworks like Flowbite, Daisy Ui, but I like Bulma, PicoCSS and Bootstrap.

While I have experience with Tailwind and frontend development, I don’t really have the patience to use it. I usually end up using something like Mantine, which is a complete component library UI kit, or Daisy UI, which is a component library built on top of Tailwind. Shadcn/ui is quite similar to Daisy in this sense, but being able to customize the individual components, since they get installed to your components folder, made development more streamlined and more customizable. On top of that being able to change my components style with natural language thanks to v0 made development super easy and fast. Shadcn may be too minimalist of a style for some, but thanks to all the components being local, you can customize them quickly and easily!

https://daisyui.com is a really great middle ground—you can move as fast as you would in Bulma, then drop down into the weeds with TW if you need it.

If you're looking for grab and go components, Daisy UI or Flowbite might be more your speed, I've used both with minimal headache.

https://daisyui.com/

This guide is tailored for front-end developers looking to explore the smooth integration of DaisyUI's stylish components, Alpine.js's minimalist reactive framework, and the straightforward back-end capabilities of Codehooks.io.

Others:

  - https://daisyui.com/