models VS onnx

Uh, maybe they didn't feel the need to look. I already pointed you to the ONNX project. Here are some ONNX-based. These are just the ones being shared with the community. The limit of AMD's responsibility is writing the low-level libraries to support ONNX.

I am new to object detection models and I need help running my object detection Darknet YOLOv4-Tiny Model In Unity Barracuda. I trained my model and then i converted it to ONNX format with 2 methods. One method was using pytorch-YOLOv4 from github and the other by converting my model to tensorflow and then to onnx and shown here: "https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/object_detection_segmentation/yolov4/dependencies/Conversion.ipynb"

Then i tried to convert it again using another method that i found here "https://github.com/onnx/models/blob/main/vision/object_detection_segmentation/yolov4/dependencies/Conversion.ipynb" in order to convert it from darknet to tensorflow and then to onnx but i didn't have any luck.

Here we use the GPT-2 model distributed by the ONNX official. Download GPT-2-LM-HEAD from the link.

Download pre-trained models from the ONNX Model Zoo

Instructions to reproduce the problem: I am trying to convert a proprietary model at work but for now i'll use mobilenetv2-7.onnx to explain/reproduce the issue.

One approach could be run a pre-trained object detector (like one of these) on each frame and then a simple object tracker on top of it (like this).

Once your model has been trained and validated using Anomalib, the next step is to prepare it for real-time implementation. This is where ONNX (Open Neural Network Exchange) or OpenVINO (Open Visual Inference and Neural network Optimization) comes into play.

ONNX is an open format from the Linux Foundation to represent machine learning models. It is becoming extensively adopted by the Machine Learning community and is compatible with most of the machine learning frameworks like PyTorch, TensorFlow, etc. Converting a model between any of those formats and ONNX is really simple and can be done in most cases with a single command.

ONNX[0], model-as-protosbufs, continuing to gain adoption will hopefully solve this issue.

[0] https://github.com/onnx/onnx

Running inference for large models on CPU is not a new problem and fortunately there has been great development in many different optimization frameworks for speeding up matrix and tensor computations on CPU. We explored multiple optimization frameworks and methods to improve latency, namely TorchScript, BetterTransformer and ONNX.

ONNX is a format for representing machine learning models in a portable way. Additionally, ONNX models can be easily optimized and thus become smaller and faster.

I would say onnx.ai [0] provides more information about ONNX for those who aren’t working with ML/DL.

[0] https://onnx.ai

It's not clear why you thing this sub is appropriate for some third party system with a Python interface. Why don't you try their discussion group: https://github.com/onnx/onnx/discussions

This kind of indirection through standardisation is pretty common to make compatibility between different kinds of software components easier. Some other good examples are the LSP project from Microsoft and ONNX to represent machine learning models. The first provides a standard so that IDEs don't have to re-invent the weel for every programming language. The latter decouples training frameworks from inference frameworks. Going back to WSGI, you can find a pretty extensive rationale for the WSGI standard here if interested.