oh
hasura-ci-cd-action
| oh | hasura-ci-cd-action | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 2 | |
| 1,344 | 35 | |
| - | - | |
| 4.3 | 0.0 | |
| 8 months ago | 10 months ago | |
| Go | Shell | |
| MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
oh
- Understanding the Power of Lisp (2020)
- Bass – Lisp dialect for scripting the infrastructure beneath your project
-
CommandConsole: A shell written in C
I think an extensible shell like oh shell would be something I would prefer. Though it should not need closures on heap to extend (which is ridolous slow on arithmetic) and generate the data types at compilation time.
-
Bash functions are better than I thought
> Is there a reason we aren’t using a shell with a proper programming language for scripting?
Mostly because the people who want to introduce a "programming language" into the shell don't prioritize being a shell.
Check out the "Oh" shell for contrast. This is what a programming language looks like when you force it to conform to being a shell first priority.
https://github.com/michaelmacinnis/oh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1m-WEZz46U
This is "Scheme-like" but has FEXPRs so things can be redefined and evaluation can be controlled.
-
Show HN: SectorLISP Now Fits in One Sector
I love chatting about Kernel :D Here's my most recent post: https://lobste.rs/s/d0hogq/problem_with_macros#c_nozcrm
Thanks for showing me Oh! It really has f-exprs?! I didn't immediately see it in https://github.com/michaelmacinnis/oh/blob/main/doc/manual.m...
- Oh, a New Unix Shell
hasura-ci-cd-action
-
Bash functions are better than I thought
I write a LOT of bash/shell scripts. And I don't like it, it's just part of what I have to do.
Learning a handful of bash idioms and best-practices has made a massive impact for me, and life much easier. The shell is something you cannot avoid if you're a programmer or other sort of code-wrangler.
You can interact with it + be (mostly) clueless and still get things done, but it's a huge return-on-investment to set up "shellcheck" and lookup "bash'isms", etc.
----
(Off-topic: I am convinced Ruby cannot be beaten for shell-scripting purposes. If I had a wish, it would be that every machine had a tiny Ruby interpreter on it so I could just use Ruby. I'm not even "a Ruby guy", it's just unreasonably good/easy for this sort of thing. And I keep my mind open for better alternatives constantly.)
Example of near-identical script in bash vs Ruby:
https://github.com/GavinRay97/hasura-ci-cd-action/blob/maste...
https://github.com/GavinRay97/hasura-ci-cd-action/blob/maste...
What are some alternatives?
elvish - Powerful scripting language & Versatile interactive shell
mycmd - Tool for writing and running commands from a command directory
sicp - HTML5/EPUB3 version of SICP
murex - A smarter shell and scripting environment with advanced features designed for usability, safety and productivity (eg smarter DevOps tooling)
cl-unix-cybernetics - UNIX system administration in Common Lisp
stripe-jobs-cli
nsd - NGS Scripts Dumpster
Seed - A Rust framework for creating web apps
PPSS - Parallel Processing Shell Script
to - 📜 Touch Lightweight Markup Language; Familiar, Extendable, Auto-Formattable
lsofer - script to match similar functionality to lsof -i, and then some.