official-images
buildx
Our great sponsors
official-images | buildx | |
---|---|---|
14 | 28 | |
6,271 | 3,230 | |
1.7% | 3.0% | |
10.0 | 9.6 | |
2 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Shell | Go | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
official-images
-
Nix is a better Docker image builder than Docker's image builder
Ubuntu now has snapshot.ubuntu.com, see https://ubuntu.com/blog/ubuntu-snapshots-on-azure-ensuring-p...
Related discussion about reproducible builds by the Docker people: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/issues/160...
- Starter for Jakarta EE staged (beta)
-
How to own your own Docker Registry address
> In their updated policy, it appears they now won't remove any existing images, but projects who don't pay up will not be able to publish any new images
This is not correct. It's the "organization" features are going away. That is the feature which lets you create teams, add other users to those teams, and grant teams access to push images and access private repositories. Multiple maintainers can still collaborate on publishing new images through use of access tokens which grant access to publish those images. It's kind of a hack, but it works. You would typically use these access tokens with automated CI tools anyway. This will require converting the organization account to a personal user (non-org) account. (Interesting note/disclosure: I was the engineer who first implemented the feature of converting a personal user account into an organization account some time around 2014/2015, but I no longer work there.)
For open source projects which are not part of the Docker Official Images (the "library" images [1]), they announced that such projects can apply to the Docker-Sponsored Open Source Program [2].
I would also heed the warning from the author of this article:
> Self-hosting a registry is not free, and it's more work than it sounds: it's a proper piece of infrastructure, and comes with all the obligations that implies, from monitoring to promptly applying security updates to load & disk-space management. Nobody (let alone tiny projects like these) wants this job.
Having most container images hosted by a handful of centralized registries has its problems, as noted, but so does an alternative scenario where multiple projects which decided to go self-hosted eventually lack the resources to continue doing so for their legacy users. Though, I suppose the nice thing about container images is that you can always pull and push them somewhere else to keep around indefinitely.
[1] https://hub.docker.com/u/library
-
Docker's deleting Open Source images and here's what you need to know
Indeed. While I do maintain two of them, that maintenance is effectively equivalent to being an open source maintainer or open source contributor. I do not have any non-public knowledge about the Docker Official Images program. My interaction with the Docker Official Images program can be summed up as “my PRs to docker-library/official-images” (https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pulls/TimW...) and the #docker-library IRC channel on Libera.Chat.
-
Oracle per-employee Java pricing causes concern
"AdoptOpenJDK up until now was producing OpenJDK binaries with both Hotspot and OpenJ9 VM's. With Adopt's move to Eclipse, legal restrictions prevent the new Eclipse Adoptium group from producing/releasing OpenJ9 based binaries. As a result, IBM will be producing OpenJ9 based binaries in 2 flavours, Open and Certified, both under the family name IBM Semeru Runtimes. Essentially the same binaries, released under different licenses."
Source: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/10666...
-
PHP 8.2.0 has been released!
They should be available soon, the corresponding PR at docker-library/official-images has already been merged: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/13693
-
Docker series (Part 8): Images from Docker Hub
Official image lists are added here: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/tree/master/library
-
GCC 12.1 Released
Looks like this PR will release the official version to the hub: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/12382
-
1 Million Docker pulls and more container updates
We’ve also officially release containers for ppc64le available on all the major registries and we’ve also gone ahead and updated our containers to 8.5.4 and patched against the latest security updates where applicable. 18 packages have been updated and you can see that work here.
- Where are the 10.7.2/10.7.3 docker images?
buildx
-
BuildKit in depth: Docker's build engine explained
This is great! I’ve been waiting a long time for this and it seems like more debug features are in the pipeline too: https://github.com/docker/buildx/issues/1104
Docs: https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/buildx_...
-
Nx + NextJS + Docker - The Nx way: Creating the NextJS application
Container engine: Docker v23.0.4 | Buildx v0.10.4
- Using Docker Buildx to Create Cross-Platform Docker Images for Seamless Compatibility
-
Cross-platform container images with buildx and colima
ARCH=amd64 # change to 'arm64' for M1 VERSION=v0.10.4 curl -LO https://github.com/docker/buildx/releases/download/${VERSION}/buildx-${VERSION}.darwin-${ARCH} mkdir -p ~/.docker/cli-plugins mv buildx-${VERSION}.darwin-${ARCH} ~/.docker/cli-plugins/docker-buildx chmod +x ~/.docker/cli-plugins/docker-buildx docker buildx version # verify installation
-
Help Downloading Buildx on Play-with-Docker Instance
wget -O /tmp/docker/cli-plugins/docker-buildx https://github.com/docker/buildx/releases/tag/v0.10.4/buildx-v0.10.4.linux-amd64
-
docker-ce upgrade broke my builds
Your particular one looks somewhat like https://github.com/docker/buildx/issues/1595.
-
One Dockerfile is all it takes, falling in love with bake
Now, we have examples of the actual definitions for a single application’s docker container. Notice that we set the contexts key here which references the dependency targets we just defined. You can basically think of this like the depends_on block if you’ve used Terraform before. The args key let’s us populate the ARG variables in the Dockerfile. This is what is ultimately different between each of the containers. In the future, the buildx team might support using for_each loops like in Terraform but for now each block will have a bit of duplication.
-
Optimize your docker containers
Now as bonus we i will add how to use this techniques to build a multi arch build container. Maybe you have the same application but you need to run it in arm or riscv architecture. For this we can use the buildx plugin from docker https://github.com/docker/buildx.
-
Pushing Cutom Images to Docker Hub using GitHub Actions
Third step is docker/setup-buildx-action configures buildx, which is a Docker CLI plugin that provides enhanced build capabilities.
- How to build multi-architecture Docker images?
What are some alternatives?
gcc - Docker Official Image packaging for gcc
buildkit - concurrent, cache-efficient, and Dockerfile-agnostic builder toolkit
registry.k8s.io - This project is the repo for registry.k8s.io, the production OCI registry service for Kubernetes' container image artifacts
ghaction-docker-meta - GitHub Action to extract metadata (tags, labels) for Docker [Moved to: https://github.com/docker/metadata-action]
backend
aws-graviton-getting-started - Helping developers to use AWS Graviton2 and Graviton3 processors which power the 6th and 7th generation of Amazon EC2 instances (C6g[d], M6g[d], R6g[d], T4g, X2gd, C6gn, I4g, Im4gn, Is4gen, G5g, C7g[d][n], M7g[d], R7g[d]).
nerdctl - contaiNERD CTL - Docker-compatible CLI for containerd, with support for Compose, Rootless, eStargz, OCIcrypt, IPFS, ...
crates.io-index - Registry index for crates.io
4.2BSD - Upload of the source of 4.2BSD taken from /usr/src
build-push-action - GitHub Action to build and push Docker images with Buildx
lmctfy - lmctfy is the open source version of Google’s container stack, which provides Linux application containers.
multi-platform-docker-build - Using BuildKit and TARGETPLATFORM for cross-platform Dockerfiles