nyc VS pr-approve-generator

Native code coverage via v8 or istanbul.

Writing tests is essential, and knowing whether you test all the required cases for your logic is even more critical. The most common testing coverage tool is Istanbul, where you can see how well your tests exercise your code by lines, functions, and branches. Below is an example of how the test coverage report looks in your terminal:

Here is a quote from istanbul, one of the most used code coverage tool:

Unit testing framework was already implemented, using Vitest so I started hacking by setting up a coverage provider to explicitly identify the covered/uncovered lines and mentioned this to the maintainer in the comments. I used Istanbul 🇹🇷 for this purpose.

Your project probably has a coverage report. If you’re using Jest as your unit test runner, generating a coverage report is embedded in it. It is done with Istanbul under the hood, which generates a nice HTML page presenting the entire project unit test coverage.

> This is a rant written by someone with just enough understanding to be dangerous, but not quite enough wisdom to know why things are still the way they are. Most of the complaints raised are subtly inaccurate.

Author seems aware of CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE: https://source.small-tech.org/site.js/app/-/issues/169 and https://github.com/istanbuljs/nyc/issues/1281 – the "side effects" are NodeJS explicitly checking for it, so that's a NodeJS thing and not a Linux thing.

Yet curiously it's completely unmentioned in this article, in spite that this is probably what started the author's dislike of privileged ports. I guess it was inconvenient as it got in the way of angrily ranting.

This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through

https://istanbul.js.org/ measures how much of your code is covered by tests

Jest uses a package called Istanbul to provide test coverage metrics such as statement, branch, function, and line coverage so that you can understand and enforce the quality of your test suite, providing more confidence in releases.

So let’s see if nyc (the code coverage generator) can help with that. Hmm… this documentation seems interesting! So basically what I understand from it is that I need to collect all the reports from the different packages and then run the nyc report over it. The flow should be like this:

Whether you contribute small or big chunks of code, being consistent about them carries vital importance. Small contributions to a particular project help you to get familiar with it at first and leads to something bigger. Take a look at some pull requests I have raised to the following projects; withfig, cve-bin-tool, my-photohub, pr-approve-generator.

P.S. This is the tool I'm talking about https://pr.pavelkeyzik.com

The project I contributed to was a web app called pr-approve-generator that generates encouraging messages for PRs. It is intended to be used by project maintainers in GitHub to hearten their contributors.

You can check this app here https://pr.pavelkeyzik.com/ but I also want to ask you a little question. What do usually say when leave some comment to approve Pull Request. If you want, you can add this message as comment, or even contribute to the app. You'll just need to add your message to this file https://github.com/pavelkeyzik/pr-approve-generator/blob/master/src/core/messages.js