nvim-treesitter-textobjec
web-frameworks
nvim-treesitter-textobjec | web-frameworks | |
---|---|---|
4 | 26 | |
- | 6,900 | |
- | 0.3% | |
- | 9.8 | |
- | 1 day ago | |
PHP | ||
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nvim-treesitter-textobjec
-
My Favorite Vim Oneliners for Text Manipulation
Thank you! It looks like nvim-treesitter-textobjects is a good plugin to start with:
https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjec...
- Nim Version 1.6 Released
-
Neovim v0.5
Tree-sitter based text-objects are one of my favourite parts of neovim 0.5 too. Now I can have class, function, parameter, and comment text-objects that can be manipulated as easily as words or paragraphs.
This plugin sets it all up and has some examples: https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjec...
- Neovim 0.5 Is Overpowering
web-frameworks
-
[Web Frameworks Benchmark] How is the FOMO framework handling 45k+ requests more than Swoole the framework it depends on?
Notably it seems that Fomo is using the raw Swoole Server (https://github.com/fomo-framework/framework/blob/a52b75abbd06c0aa6cb1ec47c4011557bc347532/src/Servers/Http.php#L21) rather than the HTTP-specific server wrapper which is what is used in the Swoole benchmark: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/blob/master/php/swoole/start.php
-
Understanding web stack performance
As an Experienced Developer (TM), I'd like to authoritatively know whether a given tech stack is "slow" or "fast", measured in requests per seconds. I'd like to find a way to correctly and objectively measure performance, but most performance suites measure a small thing in isolation. For example, The Benchmarker measures the performance of HTTP APIs, but the requests are super simple (GET request that gets a value, POST request that doesn't do anything but return a value, empty GET).
- Go with Chi has more ram consumption and less req/s than Koa or Fastify
- tools to stress test your website
- Which is the fastest web framework?
- Slower than Go, Java and JS?
-
The NanoMux HTTP router benchmark results
Hi friends. I've opened pull requests for the-benchmarker/web-frameworks and Go HTTP Router Benchmark. Hopefully, they will be merged soon. Here are the benchmark results that I got on my laptop from Julien Schmidt's Go HTTP Router Benchmark. For comparison, I also added Chi, GorillaMux, and HttpRouter.
-
Django Ninja - Help debugging/understanding Internals
The benchmark code: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks
- Passenger 介紹
-
Nim Version 1.6 Released
And the httpbeast code is here: https://github.com/the-benchmarker/web-frameworks/tree/maste...
What are some alternatives?
jester - A sinatra-like web framework for Nim.
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
prologue - Powerful and flexible web framework written in Nim
wrk - Modern HTTP benchmarking tool
treesitter-unit - A Neovim plugin to deal with treesitter units
graphql-benchmarks - GraphQL benchmarks using the-benchmarker framework.
nvim-treesitter-textobjects
PHP-CRUD-API - Single file PHP script that adds a REST API to a SQL database
language-server-protocol - Defines a common protocol for language servers.
Fusio - Open source API management platform
LunarVim - 🌙 LunarVim is an IDE layer for Neovim. Completely free and community driven.
ray - Debug with Ray to fix problems faster