nvim-bqf VS kok.nvim

Quickfix list: nvim-bqf

For the Telescope method, you can install nvim-bqf, so that after you press Ctrl-Q on the telescope results, you can curate the results. See https://github.com/kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf#filter-with-signs

You can get some of that behaviour with nvim-bqf

This is what I have been using. That with better quickfix is awesome https://github.com/kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf

This is an essential plugin for me, pretty much the only thing it doesn't do is what you are asking, but its on the projects todo list https://github.com/kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf

For an instant preview for the item in quickfix, please try nvim-bqf. It is so damn good!!!!

nvim-bqf: https://github.com/kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf

J'aime bien https://github.com/mhinz/vim-grepper Et https://github.com/kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf Pour ce travail.

When it comes to the quickfix, I can't recommend kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf enough. It's a great plugin that makes using the qflist a breeze.

There are a number of plugins to edit the quickfix window, I like: https://github.com/kevinhwang91/nvim-bqf

In the examples listed on this page https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim, there is a pattern overlay over the whole screen. Is there a neovim plugin that does this? Thanks.

nvim-cmp or coq_nvim is for autocompletion. Treesitter is for parsing language syntax. (I guess the most typical use case for this would be syntax highlighting.) Note that (neo)vim also has built in manual completion that you can use by setting up your omnifunc and triggering it with in insert mode .

Aw man that's not nice to hear. I have had my own struggle with lsp not gonna lie. I used to use coc until it got too slow, after struggling for like 2 days lol lsp is working fast and neat. I'd suggest you to take a look at coq https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim which claims to be fast as fuck (literally lol) and also claims to be faster than lsp (because its written using c or something). Haven't tried it personally

Coq_nvim

I'm attempting to use (coq_nvim)[https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim]. This is my config:

Does your coq_nvim and nvim-lspconfig really load? Because they have opts = true

I'd be happy for someone who knows more about this to correct me. But in my experience as well, nvim-cmp is not as good completion as vscode, its suggestions can be all over the place sometimes. I found that coq_nvim tends to better in this regard. I still prefer nvim-cmp for other reasons but you should definitely try coq_nvim out and see if you have a better experience.

Coq_nvim isn't the same as Coc.nvim. Coq is a completion plugin with lots of caching written in Python that works alongside the builtin LSP. Coc is an LSP client (and has it's own plugin ecosystem) written in Node.

There are some like https://github.com/SirVer/ultisnips and https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim. Speed is not really an issue, I guess people just prefer to have fewer dependencies and use lua which is already bundled in neovim.

Maybe using coq.nvim instead of nvim-cmp could help (?) dince it caches the LSP responses. I haven't test it, though