nsimd VS SimSIMD

I've decided to switch to something better, and after a few hours of searching, I found this repository: NSIMD https://github.com/agenium-scale/nsimd FastDifferentialCoding https://github.com/lemire/FastDifferentialCoding VS https://github.com/VcDevel/Vc XSIMD https://github.com/xtensor-stack/xsimd

> - Waiting for Cross-Platform standardized SIMD vector datatypes

which language has standardized SIMD vector datatypes ? most languages don't even have any ability to express SIMD while in C++ I can just use Vc (https://github.com/VcDevel/Vc), nsimd (https://github.com/agenium-scale/nsimd) or one of the other ton of alternatives, and have stuff that JustWorksTM on more architectures than most languages even support

- Using nonstandard extensions, libraries or home-baked solutions to run computations in parallel on many cores or on different processors than the CPU

what are the other native languages with a standardized memory model for atomics ? and, what's the problem with using libraries ? it's not like you're going to use C# or Java's built-in threadpools if you are doing any serious work, no ? Do they even have something as easy to use as https://github.com/taskflow/taskflow ?

- Debugging cross-platform code using couts, cerrs and printfs

because people never use console.log in JS or System.println in C# maybe ?

- Forced to use boost for even quite elementary operations on std::strings.

can you point to non-trivial java projects that do not use Apache Commons ? Also, the boost string algorithms are header-only so you will end up with exactly the same binaries that if it was in some std::string_algorithms namespace:

https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43vKadbde

For other languages (including nodejs/bun/rust/python etc) you can have a look at SimSIMD which I have contributed to this year (made recompiled binaries for nodejs/bun part of the build process for x86_64 and arm64 on Mac and Linux, x86 and x86_64 on windows).

[0] https://github.com/ashvardanian/SimSIMD

Kahan floats are also commonly used in such cases, but I believe there is room for improvement without hitting those extremes. First of all, we should tune the epsilon here: https://github.com/ashvardanian/SimSIMD/blob/f8ff727dcddcd14...

As for the 64-bit version, its harder, as the higher-precision `rsqrt` approximations are only available with "AVX512ER". I'm not sure which CPUs support that, but its not available on Sapphire Rapids.

I encourage one to merge into e.g. {NumPy, SciPy, }; are there PRs?

Though SymPy.physics only yet supports X,Y,Z vectors and doesn't mention e.g. "jaccard"?, FWIW: https://docs.sympy.org/latest/modules/physics/vector/vectors... https://docs.sympy.org/latest/modules/physics/vector/fields.... #cfd

include/simsimd/simsimd.h: https://github.com/ashvardanian/SimSIMD/blob/main/include/si...

conda-forge maintainer docs > Switching BLAS implementation:

Hello, everybody! I was working on the next major release of USearch, and in the process, I decided to generalize its underlying library - SimSIMD. It does one very simple job but does it well - computing distances and similarities between high-dimensional embeddings standard in modern AI workloads.

Hey everyone! I am excited to share updates on four of my & my teams' open-source projects that take large-scale search systems to the next level: USearch, UForm, UCall, and StringZilla. These projects are designed to work seamlessly together, end-to-end—covering everything from indexing and AI to storage and networking. And yeah, they're optimized for x86 AVX2/512 and Arm NEON/SVE hardware.

USearch [1]: Think of it as Meta FAISS on steroids. It's now quicker, supports clustering of any granularity, and offers multi-index lookups. Plus, it's got more native bindings than probably all other vector search engines combined: C++, C, Python, Java, JavaScript, Rust, Obj-C, Swift, C#, GoLang, and even slightly outdated bindings for Wolfram. Need to refresh that last one!

UForm v2 [2]: Imagine a much smaller OpenAI CLIP but more efficient and trained on balanced multilingual datasets, with equal exposure to languages from English, Chinese, and Hindi to Arabic, Hebrew, and Armenian. UForm now supports 21 languages, is so tiny that you can run it in the browser, and outputs small 256-dimensional embeddings. Perfect for rapid image and video searches. It's already available on Hugging-Face as "unum-cloud/uform-vl-multilingual-v2".

UCall [3]: It started as a FastAPI alternative focusing on JSON-RPC (instead of REST protocols), offering 70x the bandwidth and 1/50th the latency. It was good but not enough, so we've added REST and TLS support, broadening its appeal. I've merged that code, and it is yet to be tested. Early benchmarks suggest that we still hit the same 150'000-250'000 requests/s on a single CPU core in Python by reusing HTTPS connections.

StringZilla [4]: This project lets you sift through multi-gigabyte or terabyte strings with minimal use of RAM and maximal use of SIMD and SWAR techniques.

All these projects are engineered for scalability and efficiency, even on tight budgets. Our demo, for instance, works on hundreds of gigabytes of images using just a few gigabytes of RAM and no GPUs for AI inference. That is a toy example with a small, noisy dataset, and I look forward to showing a much larger setup. Interestingly, even this tiny setup illustrates issues common to UForm and much larger OpenAI CLIP models - the quality of Multi-Modal alignment [5]. It also shows how different/accurate the search results are across different languages. Synthetic benchmarks suggest massive improvements for some low-resource languages (like Armenian and Hebrew) and more popular ones (like Hindi and Arabic) [6]. Still, when we look at visual demos like this, I can see a long road ahead for us and the broader industry, making LLMs Multi-Modal in 2024 :)

All of the projects and the demo code are available under an Apache license, so feel free to use them in your commercial projects :)

PS: The demo looks much nicer with just Unsplash dataset of 25'000 images, but it's less representative of modern AI datasets, too small, and may not be the best way to honestly show our current weaknesses. The second dataset - Conceptual Captions - is much noisier, and quite ugly.

[1]: https://github.com/unum-cloud/usearch