nqp VS Raku-Steering-Council

hi! I was looking at REPL-like evaluation of code from here and here, and tried to make a very small version for it, yet it fails:

Second, any "inheritance" is optional. Quoting nqp's 6model overview with my added emphasis:

Considering it has a compiler (which generates an NFA), I do not think it is fair to call it an interpreter.

When I mention the Actor model, I specifically mean the Actor model, not "an actor model". That is to say, a mathematical theory, not an implementation. In contrast, ponder what you mean by "an object model". When I mention the "metamodel", I specifically mean "a framework [that] does not contain an implementation of classes, interfaces, roles, prototype objects and so forth".

NQP is a compiler like MiniPerl for Perl 5. It is a bootstrapping tool which helps to compile the Raku parts of Rakudo and compile the libraries before running have compiled the libraries. Unlike MiniPerl for Perl 5 (which is an interpreter that can interpret all Perl syntax but miss some batteries: means without modules mixing Perl code and native code), NQP can only compile a "simplified Raku". NQP refers to both the compiler and the source code contained in files with the ".nqp" extension.

I focus on the Raku stack: the compiler Rakudo which targets the compiler compiler NQP which targets multiple backends including MoarVM. (Which

NQP is a compiler compiler toolkit that targets multiple backends: JVM, JS, and MoarVM.

Should be https://github.com/Raku/Raku-Steering-Council/blob/main/minutes/20230429.md

There is a link in the announcement itself. But since the program just have started there are no projects on the list yet. For now I'd suggest asking on #raku IRC channel.

The Raku community decided recently to setup a steering council.

The Raku Community has a Steering Council and a Code of Conduct, and a Community Affairs Team (CAT). This CAT has issued a ban for this person.

A correction: Liz has been entirely supportive the Raku Steering Council's efforts to establish our Code of Conduct[0] and to enforce that Code.

(I know that part of this comment is referring to events that took place years ago; I don't have any firsthand knowledge about those events but want to correct the record about the present)

[0]: https://github.com/Raku/Raku-Steering-Council/blob/main/pape...

However, as Liz said, the Raku Conf is being organized by Andrew, so he is (appropriately!) the only one who gets a vote – he's doing the work, and so he gets to make the calls. The RSC's role is limited to making sure that participants follow the Raku Code of Conduct at the conference – that is, we have a purely support function.

Raku CAT has finished investigating the case. An action has been taken and a statement made: https://github.com/Raku/Raku-Steering-Council/blob/main/announcements/20210630.md