Nodemailer VS nixpkgs

Simple Express backend and then use nodemailer, https://www.npmjs.com/package/nodemailer

For email, we’re going to use the very popular nodemailer package. Throw an npm install nodemailer and import it at the top of our function, and we’ll create our transporter instance:

According to my google search (https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/issues/1410) this is caused by a particular function not being implemented in Windows 7. Anyone met this particular problem before? Is there a workaround?

Nodemailer is a popular library for sending emails in Node.js. It allows you to send emails using various transport methods, such as SMTP, AWS SES, and more. In this post, we will be using Nodemailer with TypeScript to send emails from a Next.js application.

I am using nodemailer to send an email e.g. resetting the password. So far this package is working for me and it is easy to use with nuxt. Here is the setup of it https://ibb.co/SyzJ4T9

If you want to learn more about Nodemailer you can read here: https://www.npmjs.com/package/nodemailer

Setup an SMTP service. if you own the domain, you can setup whatever address you want. https://www.npmjs.com/package/nodemailer

In this article, We only learnt how to implement sending email in NOdeJS with nodemail using Gmail Service You can use askyourcode to explore the package codebase nodemailer for more ways to improve on the implementation on html templates.

Cypress 10.3^ Plugins: recurse nodemailer imapflow mailparser

I don't think so. The article is probably intended for the Nix community, so the author doesn't need to convince HN that something is going on. If as an outsider you are interested then you need to look into it yourself, the community has no obligation to make their internal conflicts legible to the outside world.

As an outsider myself, it certainly looks like something is going on as more than 20 Nixpkg maintainers left in a week: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=label%3A%228.has%3...

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commits?author=neon-sunset

I see two signers in the top 6 displayed on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/graphs/contributors

For a single file script, nix can make the package management quite easy: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-f...

For example,

```

Yes, Nix doesn't actually ensure that the builds are deterministic. In fact it works just fine if they aren't. There are packages in nixpkgs that aren't reproducible: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aiss...

I'm not familiar with Bazel, but Nix in it's current form wouldn't have solved this attack. First of all, the standard mkDerivation function calls the same configure; make; make install process that made this attack possible. Nixpkgs regularly pulls in external resources (fetchUrl and friends) that are equally vulnerable to a poisoned release tarball. Checkout the comment on the current xz entry in nixpkgs https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/tools/comp...

NixOS uses a monorepo and I think everyone's love it.

I love being able to easily grep through all the packages source code and there's regularly PRs that harmonizes conventions across many packages.

Nixpkgs doesn't include the packaged software source code, so it's a lot more practical than what Debian is doing.

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs

In this specific case, nix uses fetchFromGitHub to download the source archive, which are generated by GitHub for the specified revision[1]. Arch seems to just download the tarball from the releases page[2].

[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/3c2fdd0a4e6396fc310a6e...

[2]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/ib...