nodejs-polars VS falcon

Compare nodejs-polars vs falcon and see what are their differences.

SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
surveyjs.io
featured
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
nodejs-polars falcon
2 2
313 924
7.0% 0.5%
8.4 7.8
8 days ago 8 days ago
TypeScript Jupyter Notebook
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

nodejs-polars

Posts with mentions or reviews of nodejs-polars. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-17.

falcon

Posts with mentions or reviews of falcon. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-24.
  • Goodbye, Node.js Buffer
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Oct 2023
  • Launch HN: Drifting in Space (YC W22) – A server process for every user
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 28 Feb 2022
    Good questions!

    > Why do you need one process per user? / Wouldn't this "event loop" actually be more efficient that one user/process, as there would be less context switching cost from the OS?

    We're particularly interested in apps that are often CPU-bound, so a traditional event-loop would be blocked for long periods of time. A typical solution is to put the work into a thread, so there would still be a context switch, albeit a smaller one.

    The process-per-user approach makes the most sense when a significant amount of the data used by each user does not overlap with other users. VS Code (in client/server mode) is a good example of this -- the overhead of siloing each process is relatively low compared to the benefits it gives. We think more data-heavy apps will make the same trade-offs.

    > Can I just keep a map of (connection, thread_id) on my server, and spawn one thread per user on my own server?

    If you don't have to scale beyond one server, this approach works fine, but it makes scaling horizontally complicated because you suddenly can't just use a plain old load balancer. It's not just about routing requests to the right server; deciding which server to run the threads on becomes complicated because you ideally want to decide based on the server load of each. We started going down this path, realized we'd end up re-inventing Kubernetes, so decided to embrace it instead.

    > Could I just load up my server with many cores, and give each user a SQLite database which runs each query in its own thread? This way a multi GB database would not be loaded into RAM, the query would filter it down to a result set.

    If, for a particular use case, it's economical to keep the data ready in a database that supports the query pattern users will make, it's probably not a good fit for a session-lived backend. In database terms, where our architecture makes sense is when you need to create an index on a dataset (or subset of a dataset) during the runtime of an application. For example, if you have thousands of large parquet files in blob storage and you want a user to be able to load one and run [Falcon](https://github.com/vega/falcon)-type analysis on it.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nodejs-polars and falcon you can also consider the following projects:

ibis - the portable Python dataframe library

stateroom - A lightweight framework for building WebSocket-based application backends.

arquero - Query processing and transformation of array-backed data tables.

streams - Streams Standard

proposal-async-iterator-helpers - Methods for working with async iterators in ECMAScript

proposal-zero-copy-arraybuffer-list - A proposal for zero-copy ArrayBuffer lists

proposal-array-from-async - Draft specification for a proposed Array.fromAsync method in JavaScript.

proposal-arraybuffer-base64 - TC39 proposal for Uint8Array<->base64/hex

spawner - Session backend orchestrator for ambitious browser-based apps. [Moved to: https://github.com/drifting-in-space/plane]

parquet-wasm - Rust-based WebAssembly bindings to read and write Apache Parquet data

Sandstorm - Sandstorm is a self-hostable web productivity suite. It's implemented as a security-hardened web app package manager.