nodejs-polars VS proposal-arraybuffer-base64

Compare nodejs-polars vs proposal-arraybuffer-base64 and see what are their differences.

proposal-arraybuffer-base64

TC39 proposal for Uint8Array<->base64/hex (by tc39)
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
nodejs-polars proposal-arraybuffer-base64
2 5
726 285
0.8% -
8.2 7.1
4 days ago 7 months ago
TypeScript HTML
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

nodejs-polars

Posts with mentions or reviews of nodejs-polars. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-17.

proposal-arraybuffer-base64

Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-arraybuffer-base64. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-08.
  • Updates from the 100th TC39 meeting
    13 projects | dev.to | 8 Feb 2024
    Uint8Array to/from Base64: Uint8Array<->base64/hex.
  • Goodbye, Node.js Buffer
    15 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Oct 2023
    The proposal for native base64 support for Uint8Arrays is mine. I'm glad to see people are interested in using it. (So am I!)

    For a status update, for the last year or two the main blocker has been a conflict between a desire to have streaming support and a desire to keep the API small and simple. That's now resolved [1] by dropping streaming support, assuming I can demonstrate a reasonably efficient streaming implementation on top of the one-shot implementation, which won't be hard unless "reasonably efficient" means "with zero copies", in which case we'll need to keep arguing about it.

    I've also been working on documenting [2] the differences between various base64 implementations in other languages and in JS libraries to ensure we have a decent picture of the landscape when designing this.

    With luck, I hope to advance the proposal to stage 3 ("ready for implementations") within the next two meetings of TC39 - so either next month or January. Realistically it will probably take a little longer than that, and of course implementations take a while. But it's moving along.

    [1] https://github.com/tc39/proposal-arraybuffer-base64/issues/1...

    [2] https://gist.github.com/bakkot/16cae276209da91b652c2cb3f612a...

  • Base64 Encoding, Explained
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Oct 2023
  • Updates from the 96th TC39 meeting
    5 projects | dev.to | 18 May 2023
    Base64 for Uint8Array:ArrayBuffer to/from Base64
  • Updates from the 84th meeting of TC39
    3 projects | dev.to | 14 Jul 2021
    ArrayBuffer to/from base64: ArrayBuffer <-> base64 string functions.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nodejs-polars and proposal-arraybuffer-base64 you can also consider the following projects:

arquero - Query processing and transformation of array-backed data tables.

streams - Streams Standard

parquet-wasm - Rust-based WebAssembly bindings to read and write Apache Parquet data

falcon - Brushing and linking for big data

proposal-zero-copy-arraybuffer-list - A proposal for zero-copy ArrayBuffer lists

proposal-regexp-atomic-operators

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured

Did you know that TypeScript is
the 2nd most popular programming language
based on number of references?