netcoredbg VS azurelinux

Open source. OP is referencing a decision Microsoft made last year to include some closed-source components, in particular the debugger from Visual Studio, in the default C# extension for Visual Studio Code. There is a Samsung-provided open source debugger available if you absolutely require it, but the closed source stuff doesn't have any usage restrictions afaik.

idk what SOS is, but here is netcoredbg, and it works decently (I use it myself)

> There is open source debugger from Samsung (https://github.com/Samsung/netcoredbg/), but it does not see much use.

If you want to debug C# from Emacs, it’s the only choice AFAIK.

Or use CLi debugger on Linux server itself, I haven't used this one. https://github.com/Samsung/netcoredbg.

There is also this debugger developed by Samsung: https://github.com/Samsung/netcoredbg

They're even already producing their own Linux distribution, CBL-Mariner, https://github.com/microsoft/azurelinux

This became even more interesting as Microsoft started to open source core technology such as Powershell, the DotNET platform, their internal Linux distribution, and much more. All this hosting on GitHub also made sense acquisition wise.

Quite a few servers and network switches, actually.

Likely a recognisable ‘Windows’ GUI on-top of CBL-Mariner

Nothing new. For several years they already developed and maintained CBL-Mariner (Common Build Linux) https://github.com/microsoft/CBL-Mariner Which od a base for Azure Linux and other projects.