nesper
CppCoreGuidelines
nesper | CppCoreGuidelines | |
---|---|---|
9 | 309 | |
184 | 41,846 | |
- | 0.8% | |
2.8 | 7.7 | |
3 months ago | about 1 month ago | |
C | CSS | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nesper
- Show HN: Program ESP32s in Nim
-
Microsoft DeviceScript – TypeScript for Tiny IoT Devices
I use Nim on embedded precisely for that reason: https://github.com/elcritch/nesper
I wtapped much of zephyr as well but that ones less used: https://github.com/embeddednim/nephyr
-
Nim 2.0.0 RC2
Nim supports both since it compiles with pretty much any C89 C compiler. Also https://github.com/elcritch/nesper :)
-
Introduction to Embedded Systems Programming (Ada)
Checkout Nim! I've used it to great effect for embedded programming. It has memory management system based on non-atomic reference counting (arc) so its fast and deterministic. It has optional cycle collection too (orc). Its easy to mixin manual memory as well.
I used F# a bit and learned a lot from it, and the same with Elixir. Nim is procedural it has an "enlightened procedural" take that feels like functional programming in some ways. Partly thats due to the very powerful type system - for example Nim lets you define custom distinct (not aliased) number types just like F#. Nim also inherits a fair bit from Pascal and so shares points with Ada like ints with custom ranges. Theres some rough points, but largely its made me enjoy programming again.
The esp32 is a good route since they're easy to setup. I wrote a wrapper for esp-idf which is used in production in at least two embedded shops: https://github.com/elcritch/nesper
You can run it on Arduinos as well. Theres a pure Nim setup called Ratel and a rp2040 wrapper too. :)
-
Ask HN: Who is using C++ as the main language for new project?
You should checkout Nim! I use it extensively on embedded. Nim is fantastic to program in if you're an experienced C/C++ developer. Its safer and smarter but not not pedantic about it.
Nim compiles to C or C++ so its easy to use on any embedded platform and compiler suite. Thats still huge for embedded. Rust forces a type-trait centric programming style which makes interfacing hardware/embedded harder as you have to make type heavy HALs everywhere -- hence the lack of rtos & library support despite its relative popularity).
Its pretty trivial to re-use any C/C++ libraries which gives a big boost to the native ecosystem. I wrapped most of the esp32 idf in a few weeks: https://github.com/elcritch/nesper
The new GC (ARC) is basically a built in `shared_ptr` or `Rc`. You can also do stack-based programming too and the compiler enforces a safe memory accesses. The performance is great and can match or beat C/C++ if you do a few hours of tuning. Though its easy kill performance if you're lazy (e.g. parse json into a bunch of heaps objects), but that can have its place.
-
Launching the 2021 Nim Community Survey
I would really like to see more work on improving the use of Nim for programming microcontrollers. I stumbled on to https://github.com/elcritch/nesper recently and it looks neat, but I had issues getting my code to compile. Improved support for other MCUs like the esp8266 and atmega32u4 would be really cool and useful. It would be nice to have Nim as a higher level alternative to micropython or lua in the embedded world (your only other real alternatives being C/C++ or Rust).
I also found this https://disconnected.systems/blog/nim-on-adruino
-
Nim Version 1.6 Released
Well no language is perfect, but Nim can be used in almost every domain because of it's compilation targets(C, C++, JS) and it's fast compile times(who needs interpretation when compile times are that fast!):
* Shell scripting, I still assume most people will just use Bash tho: https://github.com/Vindaar/shell
* Frontend: https://github.com/karaxnim/karax or you could bind to an existing JS library.
* Backend: For something Flask-like: https://github.com/dom96/jester or something with more defaults https://github.com/planety/prologue
* Scientific computing: the wonderful SciNim https://github.com/SciNim
* Blockchain: Status has some of the biggest Nim codebases currently in production https://github.com/status-im?q=&type=&language=nim&sort=
* Gamedev: Also used in production: https://github.com/pragmagic/godot-nim and due to easy C and C++ interop, you get access to a lot of gamedev libraries!
* Embedded: this is a domain I know very little about but for example https://github.com/elcritch/nesper or https://github.com/PMunch/badger for fun Nim+embedded stuff!
Most of the disadvantages come from tooling and lack of $$$ support.
-
Why doesn’t V8 fit on my microcontroller?
Not quite sure if I follow what you're saying. As in Tasmota/Berry do or do not do more than provide I2C/SPI?
> If one wants to do serious stuff they would use an appropriate RTOS and program it in C.
It's unfortunate, but still largely appears to be the case. I find C very time consuming to program, so I ported Nim to FreeRTOS [1]. It's _very_ nice being able to go from writing highly optimized ISR functions to high level JSON parsing in one language. Add in defaulting to memory safety but with no pause-the-world GC. I tried Rust but it seems more difficult to integrate into existing world RTOS'es, flashers, Swagger debuggers, etc.
Though, I've been curious what running a WASM VM would be like? One could integrate any language: C++, C, Nim, Rust, etc. Would be interesting.
> MongooseOS does more than this if we're talking ESP32, also other devices, Javascript, C, C++, commercial support, cloud based OTA upgrades and integration with AWS, Azure, Google and IBM Watson IoT cloud services.
MongooseOS does seem interesting, but very targeting a niche market with prebuilt needs? For future RTOS'es I think ZephyrOS [2] has a lot of potential given it's now supported by NXP [3], TI, and others but is independent of any given (cloud) vendors or other IoT companies. Some might not like the CMake based build system, but in my view all the RTOS build systems are terrible in their own special way.
1: https://github.com/elcritch/nesper
- uLisp
CppCoreGuidelines
- C++ Core Guidelines
-
Are We Modules Yet?
If you aren't aware of the c++ core guidelines[1] - it should be on your radar.
Also, it might not be a popular opinion, but I think Bjarne's books are just fine.
A Tour of C++ (3rd edition) [2]
Principles and Practice Using C++ (3rd Edition) was just published in april 2023 [3]
[1] https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppC...
- Learn Modern C++
-
Modern C++ Programming Course
You need to talk to Bjarne and Herb...
"C++ Core Guidelines" - https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines
- CLion Nova Explodes onto the C and C++ Development Scene
-
Toward a TypeScript for C++"
In addition to the other comments -
TypeScript deliberately takes a "good enough" approach to improving JavaScript, instead of designing an ideal but incompatible approach. For example, its handling of [function parameter bivariance](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/type-compatibil...) is unsound but works much better with the existing JavaScript ecosystem. By contrast, a more academic functional programming language would guarantee a sound type system but would be a huge shift from JavaScript.
By analogy, Herb Sutter is arguing that something like the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines), with tooling help in this new Cpp2 syntax, can bring real improvements to safety. Something like Rust's borrow checker would bring much stricter guarantees, backed by academic research and careful design, but would be incompatible and a huge adjustment.
-
MechE student here. Is there benefit to learning C in addition to C++, or can one do everything with C++ that can be done with C?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2olsGf6JIkU
-
C++ is everywhere, but noone really talks about it. What are people's thoughts?
Take a look at Effective Modern c++ by Scott Meyers and the ISO c++ core guidelines. These resources are great for learning how to write better, more modern C++. I don't think it would be hard to grasp if you're already familiar with the language, just make sure to actually write some code which makes use of this stuff, otherwise it's easy to forget.
What are some alternatives?
quickjs-esp32 - QuickJS port for ESP32
Crafting Interpreters - Repository for the book "Crafting Interpreters"
nim-esp8266-sdk - Nim wrapper for the ESP8266 NON-OS SDK
github-cheat-sheet - A list of cool features of Git and GitHub.
ecl
git-internals-pdf - PDF on Git Internals
ulisp - A version of the Lisp programming language for ATmega-based Arduino boards.
LearnOpenGL - Code repository of all OpenGL chapters from the book and its accompanying website https://learnopengl.com
embedded-hal - A Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) for embedded systems
Power-Fx - Power Fx low-code programming language
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
too-many-lists - Learn Rust by writing Entirely Too Many linked lists