neomake VS LunarVim

Now we see that 'errorformat' is also wrong, because the errors aren't recognised. I guess this format is for another type. This is the hard part. You're in the luck though cause I'm procrastinating mopping the floors. Let's search for errorformat and shellcheck. I found this https://github.com/neomake/neomake/issues/1882. Let's modify our values:

I want to create a new vim syntax checker for a new programming language that is not used widely, first i tried to read the code of the follwing plugins neomake, syntastic , and Ale in order to understand how i can build my own syntax checker plugin but i could not really get it so i just want know what is the best and easy way to create syntax checker plugin for vim

Slightly OT, but does anyone have tips for running nvim with docker?

Typically my vim runs in an environment where I won't necessarily have all interpreters and linters installed. I run my apps, e.g. rails, in a docker container together with ruby etc. Other apps use JS, or python etc. But my dev box won't have all those directly installed. Not to mention using different versions.

I kinda managed to hack neomake[0] to run rubocop via docker-compose, but it wasn't easy and not all linters support something like this... What's the best way to solve this? add (neo)vim to each app docker container that I use? Or is there some trick to let it access all those dockerized interpreters/linters?

[0] https://github.com/neomake/neomake

Does anybody have such? Maybe you could share your experience? I use coc.nvim. My eyes fell on these 3 tools. The first one is language server and it has coc extensions coc-sh. But others are not so I am not sure which vim plugin should I use to hook them up: besides diagnostic-languageserver there are syntastic and neomake - bash-language-server - shellcheck - shfmt

LunarVim

I would suggest to start getting into vim by first trying out popular vim keybinding plugins available on your favorite code editor and get used to those first. Then, if you want to dive deeper into the power of Neovim, try out popular configs like LazyVim, LunarVim, NvChad... Taking Neovim from a mere text editor to a full-featured IDE with features like intellisense, debugging, testing, etc... on your own takes quite a lot of work and configuration.

I used Helix for a while due to its support for LSP out-of-the-box, which my Vim config at the time couldn't live up to. I switched back to NeoVim after finding LunarVim[1] which had everything I was trying to get setup in my own config.

[1] https://www.lunarvim.org/

I'll admit I didn't look into it, but Helix sounds like something like LunarVim (https://www.lunarvim.org/)

Personally I much prefer that the editor NOT ship with something like that by default, especially when it's so easy to set up. I have several different vim config I use, including a pretty bare-bones one for headless systems, and I much prefer the ability to customize something very specifically.

Build tools that can compose together, rather than a single do-it-all tool. That is the power of the low level editors vs IDE's.

I can't comment on any implementation details, but at least with LunarVim (which I use for daily coding), a slowdown when interacting with LSP is very noticeable. Some others have attested to this on a GitHub issue.

I'm not doubting your experiences with the lack of a slowdown, but there is truth that others do experience it. That might be more of a problem with LunarVim itself rather than Vim, but how likely am I (as someone who would like to avoid what he calls "config hell") or other newcomers to avoid whatever pitfalls there are, if a distribution designed for ease of use by people who know better fall into them?

https://github.com/LunarVim/LunarVim/discussions/3359

Anyways, although i have not used them, LazyVim and LunarVim comes highly recommended. You can try these and see what suits you .