NATS VS Asynq

Compare NATS vs Asynq and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
NATS Asynq
11 32
5,136 8,615
2.0% -
9.1 7.0
5 days ago 6 days ago
Go Go
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

NATS

Posts with mentions or reviews of NATS. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-21.

Asynq

Posts with mentions or reviews of Asynq. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-06.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NATS and Asynq you can also consider the following projects:

nsq - A realtime distributed messaging platform

machinery - Machinery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing.

Centrifugo - Scalable real-time messaging server in a language-agnostic way. Self-hosted alternative to Pubnub, Pusher, Ably. Set up once and forever.

work - Process background jobs in Go

EventBus - [Go] Lightweight eventbus with async compatibility for Go

Faktory - Language-agnostic persistent background job server

go-nsq - The official Go package for NSQ

temporal - Temporal service

dbus - Native Go bindings for D-Bus

emitter - Emits events in Go way, with wildcard, predicates, cancellation possibilities and many other good wins

gocelery - Celery Distributed Task Queue in Go