nanovgXC VS vger-rs

Nice work. Any plan to add GPU (opengl) support? CPU rendering is OK but the performance using the GPU is likely order of magnitudes better. Here is a library that uses the same antialiasing technique https://github.com/styluslabs/nanovgXC using OpenGL (based on NanoVG).

GPU vector graphics library I released a few years ago: https://github.com/styluslabs/nanovgXC - basically a new backend for nanovg that supports arbitrary paths. Coverage calculation (for analytic antialiasing) is explained a bit here: https://github.com/styluslabs/nanovgXC/blob/master/src/nanov...

Getting sufficient antialiasing quality for 2D graphics is difficult on GPUs. https://github.com/memononen/nanovg accomplishes this with GL2/GLES2 level hardware for most of the stuff one would want to render as part of a GUI. My project https://github.com/styluslabs/nanovgXC supports rendering arbitrary paths with exact coverage antialiasing, but requires GLES3.1 or GL4 level hardware for reasonable performance.

I've done a library for vector graphics on the GPU which works pretty well for my uses:

https://github.com/audulus/vger

and a rust version:

https://github.com/audulus/vger-rs

(which powers my rust GUI library: https://github.com/audulus/rui)

Here's the approach for rendering path fills. From the readme:

> The bezier path fill case is somewhat original. To avoid having to solve quadratic equations (which has numerical issues), the fragment function uses a sort-of reverse Loop-Blinn. To determine if a point is inside or outside, vger tests against the lines formed between the endpoints of each bezier curve, flipping inside/outside for each intersection with a +x ray from the point. Then vger tests the point against the area between the bezier segment and the line, flipping inside/outside again if inside. This avoids the pre-computation of Loop-Blinn, and the AA issues of Kokojima.

It works pretty well, and doesn't require as much preprocessing as the code in the article. Also doesn't require any GPU compute (though I do use GPU compute for some things). I think ultimately the approach in the article (essentially Piet-metal, aka tessellating and binning into tiles) will deliver better performance, and support more primitives, but at greater implementation complexity. I've tried the Piet-metal approach myself and it's tricky! I like the simpler Shadertoy/SDF inspired approach :)