nano-community VS nakomoto-coefficient-calculator

Nano foundation will be dismantled soon, they have very little funding left and it's a good thing, we don't need them. Colin is a coder just like the rest of us, he's very talented and at the right time at the right place with the right idea but we can't depend on him forever. The community will take over. https://nano.community

And https://nano.community are both pretty good resources in general

Sources and calculations: Energy per bitcoin transaction: 734 kWh (https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption ) (4 day average, 08.02.2023) Energy consumption of the nano network based on TPD by principal representatives: 57 kWh/day (https://nano.community) (4 day average, 08.02.2023) Sustainable tps by the nano network: 20.5 tps (https://nanotps.com) (08.02.2023) 1,771,200 transactions per day (including 1 send and 1 receive block per transaction) results in 0.0322 Wh average energy consumption per transaction (network only) Energy for PoW generation of a send block: 0.0147 Wh Energy for PoW generation of a receive block (1/64th difficulty of send): 0.000230 Wh (tested by community member Ricki) Total energy for 1 nano transaction: 0.0322 Wh + 0.0147 Wh + 0.000230 Wh = 0.0471 Wh 734 kWh / 0.0471 Wh = 15,583,864 To make this more tangible with 0.0471 Wh (1 nano transaction) you can     *Use a waffle maker for 0.1 s *Power a 50 W LED lightbulb for 3 s *Drive a Tesla Model S for 22 cm Special thanks to Ricki (PoW data and idea for this scene), trashman (TPD calculations and data from nano.community) and Pilsner_Maxwell (original concept for the nano-energy-cubes from 2 years ago). Song: Kevin MacLeod - Black Vortex

https://nano.community/ states a 2.375 kWh/day thermal dissipation power (TDP) of all PRs based on their CPU model infos.

My articles (https://senatus.substack.com/) provide a fair bit of extra background as well, and the Nano blog (https://nano.org/en/blog) has a lot more articles. There's also the community-run Nano.community (https://nano.community/).

Here are the stats I'm planning to work on: https://github.com/mistakia/nano-community/discussions/32

With nano, we have a truly great community project called Nano.Community (https://nano.community/) which is entirely hosted on Github. Simply fork the project, make your changes according to the contribution guidlines and boom. You're helping in the best possible way you can. If you feel up to it, you can contribute directly to the nano foundation living whitepaper, too.

We've now included Celestia Labs in the Nakamoto Coefficient chart at http://nakaflow.io.

Solana's Nakamoto coefficient improved to 32 by the end of Q2 and remained above average compared to other Layer-1 networks.

isn’t it that NC that says that there are 2 entities that can shut down the ethereum network? decentralisation isn’t defined by amount of entities that you should break to stop the network (and you won’t stop the ethereum network by breaking 2 entities), but by simplicity for ordinary people to run a node and have power in the network

Ether has a NC of 2 - https://nakaflow.io/

How is Solana less trustworthy? How about we go to trust and true metric, Nakamoto coefficient. BTC is known to be the most trustworthy chain because it has the highest Nakamoto coefficient. Now compare ETH against Solana: https://nakaflow.io/

Worst case scenario: ETH's Nakamoto coefficient is 2 (https://nakaflow.io/)

Judging by the Nakamoto coefficient (number of nodes operators required to control one third or more of the network), Ethereum is one of the most centralized. Ethereum has a coefficient of 2, source: https://nakaflow.io/ I think Hedera is currently around 9.

Thanks for continuing this conversation. For anyone who's interested, we track the Nakamoto Coefficient of some Proof of Stake networks at https://nakaflow.io