mqtt-to-kafka-bridge
plane
mqtt-to-kafka-bridge | plane | |
---|---|---|
1 | 23 | |
36 | 1,579 | |
- | 2.0% | |
10.0 | 9.4 | |
over 1 year ago | 7 days ago | |
JavaScript | Rust | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
mqtt-to-kafka-bridge
-
Show HN: DriftDB is an open source WebSocket back end for real-time apps
MQTT-over-websocket does exist, and most MQTT brokers support it (Mosquito, AmazonMQ etc.). You're right about the compaction - MQTT doesn't have anything in it's protocol about compaction, and I don't know of any brokers that implement it. Having said that, you could use an MQTT-kafka bridge.
Something like Mosquito + https://github.com/nodefluent/mqtt-to-kafka-bridge + Redpanda in a docker image would work, though obv. this might be a bit overkill for most. Having said that, it does open many new avenues for interaction at scale. You pays your money...
plane
- Plane: A distributed system for running WebSocket services at scale
-
Pingora: HTTP Server and Proxy Library, in Rust, by Cloudflare, Released
One reason I'm excited about this is that it appears to let you write arbitrary routing logic into a layer 7 proxy. This is something we had to build for https://plane.dev and it would have been nicer to use something like this, but we couldn't find anything like it at the time.
- Plane: A distributed system for running stateful WebSocket services at scale
-
"VMWare rewritten in Rust
Of course, as a user, I would prefer as much as possible to be under MIT or Apache. See for instance https://plane.dev/ for a similar project which is MIT licensed and https://jamsocket.com/ for the commercial version.
- Session back end orchestrator for ambitious browser-based apps
- Plane – open-source Jira alternative
- Plane: A container orchestrator for ambitious browser-based applications
-
The growing pains of database architecture
From an earlier blog post[1], the system for synchronizing file/document state lives independently for their database. As I understand it, their database is for metadata rather than actual document content.
> It’s worth noting that we only use multiplayer for syncing changes to Figma documents. We also sync changes to a lot of other data (comments, users, teams, projects, etc.) but that is stored in Postgres, not our multiplayer system, and is synced with clients using a completely separate system that won’t be discussed in this article. Although these two systems are similar, they have separate implementations because of different tradeoffs around certain properties such as performance, offline availability, and security.
This post[2] goes into more detail on how they spin up backend processes to serve as the source of truth while documents are open (we took heavy inspiration from it when building https://plane.dev, which aims to be an open-source implementation of that architecture.)
[1] https://www.figma.com/blog/how-figmas-multiplayer-technology...
-
Show HN: Accelerated Docker builds on your local machine with Depot (YC W23)
We have been happily using Depot for months now to build https://plane.dev. Prior to finding Depot, we basically gave up on building an M1 image from a GitHub action.
(btw, I always get suspicious when a Show HN post has a lot of praise in the comments, but I swear the Depot folks did not ask me to post anything and I only saw the post because I was checking HN)
-
Launch HN: Depot (YC W23) – Fast Docker Images in the Cloud
Congrats on the launch!
We've been using Depot with Plane (https://plane.dev/). Prior to depot, I had to disable arm64 builds because they slowed the build down so much (30m+) on GitHub's machines. With Depot, we get arm64 and amd64 images in ~2m.