mockito-kotlin VS Spring

As you can see, I create mockUsersRepository object using mock( function. Then, in setup() method, I set up this repository in such a way so that it would return a list of hardcoded values. After this, on top of everything else, I check if, for mockUsersRepository object, getUsers method was called with verify function, in the test method. It’s important to note that Mockito is a very old framework and was originally written for Java. When Kotlin appeared, it turned out that out of the box this framework can work with some limitations, which is why an extension, mockito-kotlin, was released. The example above was written with it. Another Mockito’s limitation was that it was impossible to mock final classes and static methods, and all classes are final by default in Kotlin. Currently, this is solved through mockito-inline but, before, it was a serious limitation. In respect to Java development, there was and is an alternative for Android developers, PowerMock.

In the demo project, I used junit and mockito. One thing we need to pre-learn do the unit test, that is ksp class diagram.

What's wrong with Mockito for Kotlin?

Mockito does not work correctly with Kotlin types out of the box. Spring recommends using Mockk. There is also a special module for Mockito, which adds support for Kotlin - Mockito-Kotlin.

1. Spring Framework The Spring Framework is a popular Java framework used for building enterprise-level applications. This repository contains the source code for the framework and related projects such as Spring Boot and Spring Security. https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework

This interface is a simplified version of real caching abstractions from Java technologies such as the ones from Spring or JCache (JSR-107). Both are part of quite complex solutions, having more generic types and different capabilities. Also, annotations would be preferred to using Cache directly in most Java applications.

Cross-post: Controller code using Unconfined Dispatcher #32032

Mitre really lost a lot of respect with CVE-2016-1000027. Every few weeks a warning that any SpringBoot 2.x project has a CVSS 9.8, which causes all sorts of heartache for those of us bound to CVE remediation. Every blasted security tool reports this one. Spring reviewed and rejected, as did our very, very large organization. Comically, this has become the CVE we use to see how our tools allow us to white/black list entries.

Thank god Spring dropped this interface in the Framework 6.x / Boot 3.x release, and the end for non-commercial support is this year for the old stuff.

https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/2...

Referring to https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/main/spring-web/src/main/java/org/springframework/web/bind/annotation/GetMapping.java, the value could have got assigned to any of the other members like name, path, params, etc. Is there any logic involved that enables the single value passed to the GetMapping annotation to be assigned to the value member?

This one. In short, JMS listeners stopped working randomly (of course only on Saturdays, and only under load), but at first we didn't know that and suspected the message broker at fault. We had quite extensive logging, but no observability on the broker. Can't remember all the details, but eventually we figured out it was the listener container, and I could reproduce it after debugging deeply into Spring code during a load test.

GitHub Stars: 51 K GitHub Link: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework

It still has, but it is more of "imaginary" one (https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/24434).