sbt-mima-plugin
crater
Our great sponsors
sbt-mima-plugin | crater | |
---|---|---|
2 | 23 | |
447 | 610 | |
0.4% | 2.8% | |
7.5 | 7.8 | |
9 days ago | 28 days ago | |
Scala | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sbt-mima-plugin
-
Semver violations are common, better tooling is the answer
In the Scala ecosystem, MiMa [1] has been in widespread use for years. It automatically checks compatibility for the binary API of a library. Every library with any amount of success uses it. One could say it's the foundation of a stable ecosystem. We also have sbt-version-policy [2] to set it up with minimal configuration (and directly relate it to SemVer).
More recently, we got tasty-mima [3], which checks compatibility at the type system level, rather than the binary level.
[1] https://github.com/lightbend/mima
[2] https://github.com/scalacenter/sbt-version-policy
[3] https://github.com/scalacenter/tasty-mima
-
sbt/scalatest library or plugin that only re-runs tests for code that changed
Off the top of my head, a naive & approximate solution would be to use test coverage to find out which tests test which blocks of code. Then, when a binary, syntactic incompatibility is detected, re-run only these tests captured for that piece of code.
crater
-
Semver violations are common, better tooling is the answer
yup, they reference it as an inspiration: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
it's probably impossible to automate an entire ecosystem, and there is value to enabling a tighter integration within a project ecosystem (a subset of the language ecosystem).
-
Trip Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)
Rather than hypothesising about an imagined tool you could look at the actual tool which of course is in Rust's source code repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
> new proposed C++ changes - are checked against only easily and "well-known" accessible package.
Now that I have, so to say, shown you mine, lets see yours. Where is the tool to perform these checks in C++?
-
GCC 13 and the state of gccrs
The "break things" part of "move fast" is not essential, Rust cares so much about breakage they literally compile and run the tests for every crate on crates.io and github using a tool called Crater. They do this just to test changes, even for stuff thats documented to be unstable, because thats just courtesy. And tooling makes it trivial to switch between Rust versions.
-
Do one thing, and do it well, or not.
The bot's named Crater if you want to look into it more.
-
Improving Rust compile times to enable adoption of memory safety
See https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
-
Discussion about the state of neovim's plugin ecosystem
Rust compiler developers use a tool called Crater to test potentially breaking compiler changes on all crates (Rust's name for libraries) uploaded to the official repository. If plugin stability is the issue, maybe a solution along these lines would be better than merging these plugins to Neovim's core?
-
Experienced C++ users: what do you like about Rust? How would you sell it to other C++ users?
https://github.com/rust-lang/crater is the bot they use to test proposed compiler/stdlib changes against slices of the crates.io library up to and including "all of it".
-
Data-driven performance optimization with Rust and Miri
The tool you're referring to is called Crater: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater.
- GHC 9.4.2 regresses being able to do math on aarch64
-
Rust for Linux officially merged
I'm pretty certain this isn't actually true. You should look at the editions, etc. Rust also has an insane guarantee which I am certain C/C++ don't offer: It rebuilds its entire library ecosystem each time it ships to make sure nothing breaks (https://crater.rust-lang.org). I've never seen an instance were old code didn't compile on a new compiler. Rust isn't forwards compatible (new code compiles on an old compiler) of course, but what is?
What are some alternatives?
mdoc - Typechecked markdown documentation for Scala
FluentValidation - A popular .NET validation library for building strongly-typed validation rules.
sbt-header - sbt-header is an sbt plugin for creating file headers, e.g. copyright headers
actix-net - A collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.
sbt-revolver - An SBT plugin for dangerously fast development turnaround in Scala
AutoMapper - A convention-based object-object mapper in .NET.
sbt-pack - A sbt plugin for creating distributable Scala packages.
rust-prehistory - historical archive of rust pre-publication development
sbt-updates - sbt plugin that can check Maven and Ivy repositories for dependency updates
Dapper - Dapper - a simple object mapper for .Net [Moved to: https://github.com/DapperLib/Dapper]
sbt-sonatype - A sbt plugin for publishing Scala/Java projects to the Maven central.
NUnit - NUnit Framework