openjdk VS Checkstyle

Ironically, given the past history that lead to .NET existence,

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/java

https://www.microsoft.com/openjdk

https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/java

Because it turns out, making Java running on Azure, on those 60% Linux workloads, is lot of money.

Also plenty of Azure, anything CNCF related, is mostly Go and Rust.

They use a ton of java, they even have their own distro. In fact, they answer this question on its landing page (https://www.microsoft.com/openjdk):

> Java at Microsoft spans from Azure to Minecraft, across SQL Server to Visual Studio Code, LinkedIn and beyond! We use more Java than one can imagine.

# https://github.com/microsoft/openjdk/issues

That's a _very_ incorrect statement. You can use any OpenJDK (which is GPLv2 with classpath exception) distribution you want to run Apache Zookeeper without having to have any agreement with Oracle or pay any fee. The Oracle JDK is just Oracle's commercial version of their OpenJDK distribution with Oracle support.

You can use the OpenJDK distro shipped in your Linux distro (RedHat, Debian, etc.), you can use Microsoft's OpenJDK distro[1], you can use the Eclipse OpenJDK distro, you can use Amazon's OpenJDK distro [3] and there are a whole bunch more.

[1] https://www.microsoft.com/openjdk

# https://github.com/microsoft/openjdk/issues

It seems interesting to me, but when I came accross their page https://www.microsoft.com/openjdk I am kind of confused that if C# is so good and capable, what made Microsoft to use Java

We had a list of suggested code formation tools, as my code was written in Java I decided to use suggested formatter GoogleJavaFormat. However, I didn't decide to pick suggested tool for Linter. I picked Checkstyle; for the reason, that SpotBugs wasn't available for JDK 22.

Linting and Code Static Analysis: Stripe implements strict linting and code static analysis to maintain high code quality. Tools like Checkstyle for Java can be integrated into your CI pipeline to catch potential issues before they reach production.

I'm trying to use Google's checkstyle. I want certain things to be an error, such as using Tabs for indentation. When I run mvn checkstyle:check with a file with a tab in the first column, it always gives a [WARN] rather than the error that I've asked for. Pom snippet: org.apache.maven.plugins maven-surefire-plugin ${maven-surefire-plugin.version} ${maven-surefire-plugin.skipUnitTests} org.apache.maven.plugins maven-checkstyle-plugin 3.1.2 checkstyle validate check google_checks.xml UTF-8 true true warning true I'm using google_checks.xml as from https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/blob/master/src/main/resources/google_checks.xml. I have changed the severity for the FileTabCharacter to "error"

1. Conflicts between Spotless and Checkstyle Checkstyle is a tool for checking Java source code for compliance with code standards or a set of validation rules (best practices).

Never had anything like that though for four years my life revolved around getting PMD, checkstyle and Sonar rules to pass so my pull request would merge.

PMD, and checkstyle as well.

I’m a little out of date with Java, but I believe Checkstyle is currently popular: https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle

Another example can be applied to code quality itself. Most static analyzers are configurable. If you tried to set Checkstyle Google configuration to the mature project, you would probably get hundreds or even thousands of errors. You can start with just one rule. Ar first glance, it seems not so important. But after the moment when the configuration reaches the repository, you can be sure that no one else can violate this rule in the future.