microcoreutils VS daemon

Compare microcoreutils vs daemon and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
microcoreutils daemon
1 1
2 12
- -
0.0 6.6
over 2 years ago 8 months ago
C C
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

microcoreutils

Posts with mentions or reviews of microcoreutils. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-13.

daemon

Posts with mentions or reviews of daemon. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-16.
  • Systemd: The Good Parts
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 May 2021
    > You mean Slackware users on some random forum.

    Believe it or not, that's actually the official slackware forum. And whatever solution those guys come up with, it will likely become the official solution.

    > Besides, the solution they came up with uses XDG autostart which has nothing to do with systemd.

    The slackware solution involves a project that nobody has heard of before, just so it can imitate the "user-level service" feature provided by systemd: https://github.com/raforg/daemon

    > Not to mention that it's not even doing the exact same thing as the Gentoo solution and running two more commands in addition to pipewire.

    The slackware solution requires starting those 3 processes (pipewire, pipewire-media-session, pipewire-pulse) separately from 3 different .desktop files, likely because the daemon tool above can't properly reap the pipewire-pulse process (not sure whose fault is this though).

    On the other hand, the gentoo solution can start all 3 processes with just 1 .desktop files, because `pkill` takes care of it. Simple and effective.

    I think the key difference, in this case, is that the slackware guys are trying their best to imitate a systemd feature, while the gentoo guys seem to focus more on finding the best way to allow users to enjoy pipewire.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing microcoreutils and daemon you can also consider the following projects:

pomod - pomodoro daemon

rapiddisk - An Advanced Linux RAM Drive and Caching kernel modules. Dynamically allocate RAM as block devices. Use them as stand alone drives or even map them as caching nodes to slower local disk drives. Access those volumes locally or export them across an NVMe Target network. Manage it all from a web API.

coreutils - Cross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutils

e1000e-dkms-debian - Intel e1000e ethernet adapter driver (DKMS version) for Debian

progress - Linux tool to show progress for cp, mv, dd, ... (formerly known as cv)

DTLS-Examples - Examples for DTLS via SCTP and UDP using OpenSSL

BSDCoreUtils - BSD coreutils is a port of many utilities from BSD to Linux and macOS.

gentoo - [MIRROR] Official Gentoo ebuild repository

browserPOSIX-discussion - a pseudo-repo for discussion on Unix-like software in JS+Wasm ... and also about *browser* Python, Lua, Tcl.

arcan - Arcan - [Display Server, Multimedia Framework, Game Engine] -> "Desktop Engine"

oksh - Portable OpenBSD ksh, based on the Public Domain Korn Shell (pdksh).

stress-ng - This is the stress-ng upstream project git repository. stress-ng will stress test a computer system in various selectable ways. It was designed to exercise various physical subsystems of a computer as well as the various operating system kernel interfaces.