metriql VS superset

Some of the companies that operate in space are Cube Dev; Transform(currently acquired by dbt); metriql. See more companies at https://www.moderndatastack.xyz/companies/metrics-store.

Presto is pretty successful but its focus is to be distributed query engine, not a proxy layer for the existing query engines. We use Trino ( formerly Presto) as our query layer and do something similar to Hydra at Metriql [1] with a fairly different use-case. Data people provide a semantic layer with the mecrics and expose them to 18+ downstream tools.

[1]: https://metriql.com

This is why metrics store tooling have started appearing recently (e.g. TransformData, SuperGrain, Metriql, dbt Metrics) - to solve the problem of this table / metric disorganization across an org's data landscape.

We're using Superset to enable our analysts to explore our clients' SEM/SEO/analytics data. It also posts alerts to Slack when, say, the daily session count of a website isn't what was expected given the historical data.

Yeah, it's a little rough to get going, but once it is, we've found it to be a really powerful (and actively developed!) BI tool. It's even better with dbt + MetriQL [0], which can automatically sync Superset's dataset metadata directly with properties you set up in dbt.

Adding custom visualizations is much harder than it should be, but they're very much aware of that, and working to address it. Their Slack community is super-helpful, too.

[0]: https://metriql.com

As a current Looker power-user, this looks really solid.

One thing I’m not sure about though: can you use the metrics outside of the native tool, and if so how?

That is, I see Looker as a BI tool, not a metrics layer, since you mainly use the metrics you define inside Looker, not in other tools. On the other hand, something like MetriQL[0] is a pure metrics layer that can supposedly be used anywhere.

Is this both? If so, some better documentation around how to use the metrics layer would be helpful (or maybe I just didn’t look in the right place).

[0] https://metriql.com/

3. Define metrics in one place on top of your data models and expose the metrics to all the data tools. (This layer is new, and we're tapping it at https://metriql.com)

We use BSL license and metriql is free with a single database target. If you want to connect multiple dbt projects in a single deployment, you need to go through the sales cycle.

We work with ETL vendors that use metriql to make revenue with our BI tool integrations so we picked BSL license to be able to structure our business model in a way that you should be required to pay only if you're reselling metriql to your customers.

You can find the license here: https://github.com/metriql/metriql

Superset is absolutely phenomenal. I really hope Microsoft eventually releases all of their customizations they made to it internally to the OS community someday.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RY0SSvSUkMA

https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions/20094

I recently ran a little shootout between Superset, Metabase, and Lightdash. All have nontrivial weaknesses but I ended up picking Lightdash.

Superset the best of them at _data visualization_ but I honestly found it almost useless for self-serve _BI_ by business users. This issue on how to do joins in Superset (with stalebot making a mess XD) is everything difficult about Superset for BI in a nutshell. https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/8645

Metabase is pretty great and it's definitely the right choice for a startup looking to get low cost BI set up. It still has a very table centric view, but feels built for _BI_ rather than visualization alone.

Lightdash has significant warts (YAML, pivoting being done in the frontend, no symmetric aggregates) but the Looker inspiration is obvious and it makes it easy to present _groups of tables_ to business users ready to rock. I liked Looker before Google acquired it. My business users are comfortable with star and snowflake schemas (not that they know those words) and it was easy to drop Lightdash on top of our existing data warehouse.

Or like not being able to delete a user without running some SQL:

https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/13345

Almostl instantly run into this issue setting up a test instance of Superset. And the issue has been around for years.

Are you interested in trying out Superset, but you're intimidated by the local setup process? Worry not! Superset needs some initial setup to install locally, but I've got a streamlined way to get started - using the makefile! This file contains a set of scripts to simplify the setup process.

Recently I discovered BigQuery public datasets - just over 200 datasets available for directly querying via SQL. I think this is a great thing! I can connect these direct to an analytics platform (we use Apache Superset which uses Python SQLAlchemy under the hood) for example and just start dashboarding.

if they don't want to pay for powerbi, can try something like https://superset.apache.org/

In today's fast-paced data-driven world, organizations must analyze data in real-time to make timely and informed decisions. Real-time data analytics enables businesses to gain valuable insights, respond to real-time events, and stay ahead of the competition. Also, the analytics engine must be capable of running analytical queries and returning results in real-time. In this article, we will explore how you can build a real-time data analytics solution using the open-source tools Redpanda a distributed streaming platform, Apache Superset, a data visualization, and a business intelligence platform, combined with RisingWave a streaming database.