mbed-os VS etl

I see that the kl05 target was removed in os6 but it is present in os5.

It looks like both mbed: https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os/pull/14488

View various projects on github in the area of your choice. Select a project you like and look into open issues. For eg https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os seems to have 166 issues ongoing. Choose one!

Most of my interaction with mbed was when it a massive pita since it was still closed source.. I do have one interaction with the project since they opened it though

ARM Mbed OS – Update available

If you can't use the STL because of exceptions: https://www.etlcpp.com/

You can also use ETL (https://www.etlcpp.com)

Use ETL for embedded standard library functionality: https://www.etlcpp.com/

The best choice here is use embedded Template Library: https://www.etlcpp.com/

If you can't get C++23, expected it's implemented in the ETL (it's also just a really amazing library for this kind of stuff - highly recommend!).

I want to use some of C++ std library classes/functions in my embedded system library project that I'm writing. However as the environment has limited ressources I don't want to have use or expose classes or functions that do the following: * Dynamic memory allocations * RTTI * Runtime exceptions I will be rewriting some basic container and algorithms according to my needs. I know that there are other re writes of STL like ESTL but I don't want to have any external dependencies So my question is can I somehow compile/package a fork of C++ std library that only include embedded systems friendly classes such as: - array - tuple - variant - type_traits Etc This compiled library must be completely standalone. The compiler that I use can support upto C++17 standard.

I will never not recommend the Embedded Template Library

STL containers use dynamic memory allocation which is often a no-no in embedded contexts. there is the ETL https://www.etlcpp.com/ but I haven't used it!