maven-it-extension
AssertJ
maven-it-extension | AssertJ | |
---|---|---|
3 | 14 | |
86 | 2,541 | |
- | 0.5% | |
8.4 | 9.5 | |
12 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Java | Java | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
maven-it-extension
-
Your cool open source libraries
Testing Maven plugins (https://github.com/khmarbaise/maven-it-extension)
-
Maven Plugin Testing - In a Modern way - Part V
or other things. If you have good ideas do not hesitate to file in a feature request for the project so it can be made permanent part of it.
AssertJ
-
Announcing lets_expect - Clean tests in Rust.
Maybe not the feedback you want, but would you consider developing something that looks like plain old (and frankly beautiful) AssertJ?
-
7 Awesome Libraries for Java Unit & Integration Testing
AssertJ - fluent assertions
-
Any suggestions for good open source Java codebases to study(With below criteria)?
AssertJ https://github.com/assertj/assertj
- AssertJ: A fluent assertions Java library
-
Any resources for Unit Tests?
Truth or AssertJ for easier assertions in tests with better exceptions
-
Getting back into Java after 12-15 years away?
While we are at it: AssertJ is very powerful for writing assertions.
-
Imperative vs Declarative Programming
In OO you can make beautiful DSLs that allow really declarative use within that domain, e.g. test assertions in AssertJ, but everybody in the OO world is sensible enough to not try and claim OO as such being declarative. I guess they don't feel a need to try to prove the superiority of the paradigm.
-
Make your tests more readable using AssertJ and BDD syntax
AssertJ comes with a variety of assertions that can be chained together and are specific to the type of your "actual" variable.
-
How can I get rid of this warning? It's a warning for an "unchecked invocation".
At any rate it comes from a library called assertj.
-
Who here are using the Hamcrest API and why?
While Hamcrest add some fluentidity to unit tests ä, I prefer the fluent assertions of AssertJ.
What are some alternatives?
castlemock - Castle Mock is a web application that provides the functionality to mock out RESTful APIs and SOAP web services.
TestNG - TestNG testing framework
FlatLaf - FlatLaf - Swing Look and Feel (with Darcula/IntelliJ themes support)
Truth - Fluent assertions for Java and Android
bowler-script-kernel - The CLI and API layer for the Bowler ScriptingEngine and all its dependant libraries.
Hamcrest - Java (and original) version of Hamcrest
maven-compiler-plugin - Apache Maven Compiler Plugin
Spock - The Enterprise-ready testing and specification framework.
JCSG - Java implementation of BSP based CSG (Constructive Solid Geometry)
REST Assured - Java DSL for easy testing of REST services
papka - Object oriented library for working with file tree.
junit5 - ✅ The 5th major version of the programmer-friendly testing framework for Java and the JVM