mathjs VS 0.30000000000000004

The Math blocks are powered by Math.js (https://mathjs.org/).

math.js is a comprehensive JavaScript library that offers support for working with matrices and multidimensional arrays. It contains a huge array of mathematical functions in addition to array operations, making it suitable for a wide range of mathematical activities.

ii) Third-Party Libraries There are various libraries like math.js, decimal.js, big.js that solve the problem. Each library functions according to its documentation. This approach is comparatively better.

mathjs integration. Supports numbers, big numbers, complex numbers, fractions, units, strings, arrays, and matrices. Is compatible with JavaScript’s built-in Math library. Contains a flexible expression parser. Does symbolic computation. Comes with a large set of built-in functions and constants.

hey, this looks interesting. there is library, mathjs , that is providing pretty printing , which I'm looking for.

It's because it's not supported out of the box by the mathjs library I'm using: https://mathjs.org/

I agree that this would be nice.

Ha, yes, I was being nosy. It was quite easy to spot as it's the only XHR/Fetch request.

I was intrigued what you had used to build it, and if you had built your own solver (which you have), and what editor you used (Code Mirror) so went looking at the code. Interesting to see you left the source maps for production, made it easy for my sleuthing...

I experimented with a similar idea last year, but used ProseMirror/TipTap as the editor to enable rich text editing, and the MathJS (https://mathjs.org) solver. I also combined it with PouchDB and Yjs for offline editing and syncing between devices. Never finished it though, you have kept your nice and simple!

This is nice but I believe something much better can be achieved using JavaScript, in particular math.js.

I also found this math input library: http://mathquill.com/ , and https://mathjs.org/ seems to contain code for solving math problems.

What about math.js? It has an expression parser that looks pretty nice.

https://0.30000000000000004.com/

Although it would be good to move in the direction of using a BigDecimal equivalent by default when ingesting unknown data.

There's no such thing as precision for floats. Floating-point calculations are always inaccurate: read this: https://0.30000000000000004.com/

Edit: This specific example even has its own website: https://0.30000000000000004.com/

In everyday math, we know adding 0.6 + 0.3 equals 0.9, right? But when we turn to computers it results in 0.8999999999999999. Surprisingly, this doesn’t just happen only in JavaScript; it’s the same in many programming languages like Python, Java, C too. Also, it’s not just about this specific calculation. There are many more decimal calculations showing similar not-quite-right answers.

Surprisingly common values like 0.1 don't have a precise representation in binary for most formats, including standard floating point number formats. See https://0.30000000000000004.com/ for more detail than you can shake a stick at.

Also if the local tax code states using 5 decimal places for intermediate values when you will introduce “errors” using formats that give greater precision as well as those that give less precision. Having work on mortgage and pension calculations I can state that the (very) small errors seen at individual steps because of this can balloon significantly through repeated calculations.

Furthmore, the name floating point gives away the other issue. Floating point numbers are accurate to a given number of significant figures not decimal places. For large numbers any decimal places you have in the result are at best an estimate, and as above any rounding errors at each stage can compound into a much larger error by the end of a calculation.

You'll love this https://0.30000000000000004.com/