materialdesignweb
lit
materialdesignweb | lit | |
---|---|---|
17 | 141 | |
37 | 17,575 | |
- | 1.1% | |
9.3 | 9.4 | |
23 days ago | 6 days ago | |
JavaScript | TypeScript | |
ISC License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
materialdesignweb
- The future of Sync
- I made flappy bird with pure HTML CSS JavaScript
-
What problem does Virtual DOM solve for React?
I wanted something that didn't require recompilation and allows me to extend built components. Like an Chip extends a Button. I needed something that allows modification of its HTML template and layering of CSS styles on top of an extended element's styles. Frameworks are pretty rigid in this regard and I wanted to write less code to make a smaller final deployment, instead of copy pasting or having to write complicated mixins and abstractions.
-
Material You in Android 14 getting ‘personal’ with bolder ‘Fidelity’ colors
My phone is basically grayscale expect for really minor blue hue. I'm not sure why, and I know how the Material You theming works (built a framework around it).
-
Lighthouse doesn't like Shadow DOM...
For the curious: Test page - Source Code
- Lighthouse doesn't like Shadow DOMs...
-
Would it be possible to build such a bar with CSS? The hardest part looks like the curved piece of bar under the blue button.
Source: https://github.com/clshortfuse/materialdesignweb/tree/archive-md2/components
-
Anyone ever experienced any physical repulsion to Material Design after using Apple devices?
If you're tired of it, I've been maintaining my MD framework for more than 4 and a half years since 2018. And before that I was working with Google on the AngularJS implementation in 2015. So I've been looking at and working on the same styles for over 7 years.
-
[AskJS] What is an issue you struggle with your current tech stack?
Here is the JS for one of the components. Only Chrome natively understands it right now. The alternative is to use a element referencing the CSS, but will call FOUC on the first fetch.
-
Prevent button focus on long press
Code
lit
-
I've created yet another JavaScript framework
That is the reason why I experiment with the TiniJS framework for a while. It is a collection of tools for developing web/desktop/mobile apps using the native Web Component technology, based on the Lit library. Thank you the Lit team for creating a great tool assists us working with standard Web Component easier.
- Web Components e a minha opinião sobre o futuro das libs front-end
-
Show HN: I made a Pinterest clone using SigLIP image embeddings
https://github.com/lit/lit/tree/main/packages/labs/virtualiz...
-
What We Need Instead of "Web Components"
actually, looking at it (https://lit.dev/), i do exactly that.
I also define a `render()` and extend my own parent, which does a `replaceChildren()` with the render. And, strangely, I also call the processor `html`
I'll still stick with mine however, my 'framework' is half-page of code. I dislike dependencies greatly. I'd need to be saving thousand+ lines at least.
Here, I don't want a build system to make a website; that's mad. So I don't want lit. I want the 5 lines it takes to invoke a dom parser, and the 5 lines it takes do define a webcomp parent.
-
Web Components Aren't Framework Components
I rather like https://lit.dev/ for web components so far.
For the reactivity stuff, you might want to read https://frontendmasters.com/blog/vanilla-javascript-reactivi... - it shows a bunch of no-library-required patterns that, while in a number of cases I'd much rather use a library myself, all seems at least -basically- reasonable to me and will probably be far more comprehensible to you than whatever I'd reach for, and frameworks are always much more pleasant to approach after you've already done a bunch of stuff by banging rocks together first.
- Reddit just completed their migration out of React
-
Web Components Eliminate JavaScript Framework Lock-In
I work on Lit, which I would hesitate to call a framework, but gives a framework-like DX for building web components, while trying to keep opinions to a minimum and lock-in as low as possible.
It's got reactivity, declarative templates, great performance, SSR, TypeScript support, native CSS encapsulation, context, tasks, and more.
It's used to build Material Design, settings and devtools UIs for Chrome, some UI for Firefox, Reddit, Photoshop Web...
https://lit.dev if you're interested.
-
HTML Web Components
I am more a fan of the augmented style because it doesn't entrap you in dev lock-in to platforms.
The problem with frameworks, especially web frameworks, is they reimplement many items that are standard now (shadowdom, components, storage, templating, base libraries, class/async, network/realtime etc).
If you like the component style of other frameworks but want to use Web Components, Google Lit is quite nice.
Google Lit is like a combination of HTML Web Components and React/Vue style components. The great part is it is build on Web Components underneath.
[1] https://lit.dev/
-
Web Components Will Outlive Your JavaScript Framework
From the comments I see here, it seems like people expect the Webcomponents API to be a complete replacement for a JS framework. The thing is, our frameworks should start making use of modern web APIs, so the frameworks will have to do less themselves, so can be smaller. Lit [0] for example is doing this. Using Lit is very similar to using React. Some things work different, and you have to get used to some web component specific things, but once you get it, I think it's way more pleasant to work with than React. It feels more natural, native, less framework-specific.
For state management, I created LitState [1], a tiny library (really only 258 lines), which integrates nicely with Lit, and which makes state management between multiple components very easy. It's much easier than the Redux/flux workflows found in React.
So my experience with this is that it's much nicer to work with, and that the libraries are way smaller.
[0] https://lit.dev/
- Lit – a small responsive CSS framework
What are some alternatives?
old-reddit-redirect - Ensure Reddit always loads the old design
Svelte - Cybernetically enhanced web apps
buttplug-rs - Rust Implementation of the Buttplug Sex Toy Control Protocol
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.
Flickity - :leaves: Touch, responsive, flickable carousels
Vue.js - This is the repo for Vue 2. For Vue 3, go to https://github.com/vuejs/core
csswg-drafts - CSS Working Group Editor Drafts
Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀
cordova-plugin-health - Cordova plugin for the HealthKit and Google Fit frameworks
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
proposals - Tracking WebAssembly proposals
Preact - ⚛️ Fast 3kB React alternative with the same modern API. Components & Virtual DOM.